Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-crafted, token-efficient skill body that routes work by task type, defers detail to real one-level-deep reference files, and specifies exact validation commands proportional to the change. The only meaningful gap is the lack of an explicit fix-and-retry feedback loop for failed validation commands.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~60-line body is lean and entirely project-specific (editorial voice policy, selective application of sibling skills, exact repo paths), with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows and no padding to trim. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, copy-paste commands ("dart run dash_site --site=www build", "check-link-references", "serve") and exact paths (sites/www/content/blog/data.yaml, authors.yaml) are given, but a few directives remain soft ("consider previewing", "when practical") and no concrete command is provided for the TODO/TBD marker search. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Task-type routing (which reference to read per task), explicit pre-ready checks, and proportional validation with exact commands give a clear sequence with most checkpoints present; however, there is no explicit error-recovery loop for failed builds or link-reference checks (fix-and-retry guidance). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview whose three bundle files (references/post-format.md, references/google-doc-import.md, references/authors.md) all exist and are clearly signaled by task type; references are one level deep (only sibling cross-links and one parent back-link), with no detail content inlined. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |