Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured conventions reference with concrete syntax examples and a single well-signaled one-level reference. It assumes Claude's competence and avoids padding; the main improvement would be consolidating repeated write-technical-docs cross-references and adding a few more copy-paste examples.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated 'follow write-technical-docs' pointers into one explicit boundary statement to reduce redundancy.
Add copy-paste examples for the rules currently stated only as negatives (e.g. heading-level skipping, trailing-whitespace handling).
Consider moving the longer syntax catalogs (alerts, definition lists) into a reference file to strengthen the overview-to-detail split.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean bullet conventions with almost no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows (no 'what is Markdown' padding). Not a 5 because some repeated cross-references to write-technical-docs across sections could be consolidated. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable syntax guidance throughout ('## Section, not ##Section', 'Use 1. for every item', definition-list and alert examples). Not a 5 because a few areas give rules without a copy-paste example, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Well-organized into clear topical sections with an explicit precedence rule ('Apply these conventions unless the target project specifies otherwise'). Not a 5 because it is a multi-convention reference rather than a single unambiguous action, so the simple-skill 5 does not cleanly apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good section structure with one clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference ('Read [Semantic line breaks](references/semantic-line-breaks.md)') that resolves to a real file. Not a 5 because most material is inline and the overview-vs-detail split could be more pronounced. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |