Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a concise, well-structured investigation guide with a clear sequence and validation checklist, but its guidance stops short of concrete executable commands or search patterns that would make it fully actionable.
Suggestions
Add specific executable examples for the investigative steps, e.g. `git log -p -- <path>`, `grep -rn "deleted_at"`, or a test-suite invocation, so guidance is copy-paste ready rather than directional.
Tighten abstract directives like "Trace data flow" with a concrete technique (e.g., "grep for the field name across modules to find producers and consumers").
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, offering action-oriented heuristics (e.g., "`deleted_at` columns indicate soft-deletion") without padding or explaining concepts Claude already knows; nearly every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete in places (named naming variants, schema signals, a checklist) but largely directional ("Search for code that solves similar problems", "Trace data flow") with no specific executable commands or search patterns, so key details are missing for an instruction-only skill. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear Before/During sequence is paired with an explicit end Checklist as a validation checkpoint and a "Surface Concerns" section that acts as a feedback/escalation loop when conflicts arise, matching the sequenced-with-checklist anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is short and well-organized into clearly labeled sections with no need for external bundle files (none exist), which satisfies the simple-skill allowance for a top progressive-disclosure score. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |