Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable writing-process skill with a clear sequence and concrete examples. Its main weakness is a broken external reference that undermines progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Fix or remove the dangling @./../_shared/metabase-style-guide.md reference so navigation actually resolves.
Add an explicit validation/re-read checkpoint (e.g., 'Re-read aloud; if a step is unclear, rewrite it') to strengthen the feedback loop.
Tighten filler sentences like 'This ensures consistent formatting across all documentation' to lift conciseness toward 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean prescriptive guidance with no padding about basic concepts, but a few sentences are explanatory filler ('This ensures consistent formatting...', 'you don't know the reader's context'). | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete do/don't examples, a real command (yarn prettier --write), and a quick-reference table; minor gaps include an awkward escaped-backtick code block and mostly illustrative rather than copy-paste examples. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear Draft→Edit→Polish→Format sequence with light checkpoints ('Verify examples actually work', prettier); non-destructive skill so no hard validation cap applies, but no real re-validation feedback loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections, but the sole one-level-deep reference (@./../_shared/metabase-style-guide.md) does not exist on disk, so the signaled navigation is broken. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |