Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a concise, well-structured dispatcher with concrete routing rules and sensible safety controls. Its main weaknesses are hedged conditional guidance in the DOCX rule and the absence of an explicit validation feedback loop for multi-output workflows.
Suggestions
Resolve the DOCX/doc ambiguity with a decisive rule instead of the conditional "when…requested/required by your environment" phrasing.
Add an explicit validation feedback loop for multi-output sequences, e.g. verify each export before producing the next derived file and re-run on failure.
Tighten the output-expectations checklist into concrete pass/fail criteria per format (e.g. "open and confirm no Excel formula errors" as a required step).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and well-organized with no concept over-explanation (no "what is a PDF" filler); every section earns its place and assumes Claude's competence. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Routing rules are concrete and include a copy-paste clarifying question, but the DOCX rule hedges ("when…requested/required by your environment"), leaving some guidance conditional rather than fully decisive. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Multi-output sequencing is given (source-of-truth → derived exports) and verification is mentioned, but there is no explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop for batch or destructive operations. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references and clearly organized sections (dispatch rules, safety controls, output expectations), meeting the simple-skill bar for progressive disclosure. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |