Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable decision-tree skill with a concrete worked example and clear sequencing, though it carries some redundancy between the Process and Key Questions sections and references a script that is not bundled. Tightening the duplicated questions and clarifying tool references would lift it further.
Suggestions
Merge or remove the "Key Questions to Ask" section since its five questions duplicate the inline prompts already in the Process section, improving conciseness.
Clarify the status of the referenced "sympy_compute.py" tool (note it as external or remove the reference) so the example is fully self-contained and actionable.
Add a brief validation checkpoint confirming the selected framework matches all five answers before emitting the recommendation, to strengthen workflow clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the "Key Questions to Ask" section restates the five questions already embedded in the Process section, creating noticeable redundancy that could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete decision-tree mappings (e.g., "Continuous rate -> ODEs", "Convex objective -> linear/quadratic programming"), a specific output template, and a fully worked example give actionable guidance; the only gap is the referenced sympy_compute.py script that is not present in the bundle. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The five-step decision process is clearly sequenced with explicit "Ask:" prompts and answer-to-framework mappings; this is a conversational routing skill rather than a destructive or batch operation, so the missing-validation cap does not apply, though no explicit feedback loop is present. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well organized into clearly headed sections (When to Use, Process, Output Format, Example Interaction, Co-activates) with no bundle files to split out; the only organization gap is the redundant Key Questions section that overlaps the Process section. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |