CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

scientific-brainstorming

Open-ended scientific ideation partner. Use for research gaps, mechanism exploration, interdisciplinary connections, assumptions, possible research directions, and lightweight literature matrix or A+B paper-combination idea mapping. For structured testable hypotheses and validation plans, use hypothesis-generation instead.

64

Quality

75%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./bundled/skills/scientific-brainstorming/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, actionable brainstorming skill with good progressive disclosure and a clear five-phase workflow. Its main weakness is conciseness: the Overview and Core Principles restate concepts and behaviors Claude already knows, inflating the token budget without adding skill-specific value.

Suggestions

Cut the Overview restatement of the description and replace the generic Core Principles (Curious, Challenging, Domain-Aware) with skill-specific guidance, or remove them entirely.

Trim the large blocks of sample questions in each phase to one or two exemplars, trusting Claude to generate similar prompts from the named technique.

Add an explicit checkpoint between Phase 2 and Phase 3 (e.g., 'Summarize the generated ideas before connecting them') to lift workflow clarity toward 5.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The Overview restates the description and the Core Principles ('Intellectually Curious', 'Creatively Challenging') state behaviors Claude already applies, adding coaching padding; the material stays focused and usable but could be tightened substantially.

3 / 5

Actionability

Each phase names concrete techniques (Cross-Domain Analogies, Assumption Reversal, Scale Shifting, Morphological analysis, TRIZ) with example prompts, and the literature-matrix section lists specific comparison axes, though as an instruction-only skill there is no executable code or verbatim step sequence.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Five well-sequenced phases with explicit transitions and adaptive branches form a clear conversational workflow; it lacks the explicit validation checkpoints shown in the anchor-5 example, but no destructive/batch operations are involved so the cap-3 rule does not apply.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

SKILL.md is a concise overview with a single one-level-deep reference, references/brainstorming_methods.md, clearly signaled in both the workflow and a dedicated Resources section; the referenced file exists on disk.

5 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

80%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, well-scoped description with explicit what/when guidance and clear conflict disambiguation. Its main weaknesses are the missing natural trigger word 'brainstorm' and a generic role-led opening that blurs the specificity of an otherwise concrete activity list.

Suggestions

Add the natural trigger word 'brainstorming' to the Use-for clause so users who literally say 'help me brainstorm' land on this skill.

Replace the generic opening 'Open-ended scientific ideation partner.' with a verb-led statement like 'Brainstorms novel research ideas and connections.' to lift specificity to a clean 5.

Rephrase 'A+B paper-combination idea mapping' in plainer terms or pair it with a natural synonym to improve trigger-term quality.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists six concrete ideation activities ('research gaps, mechanism exploration, interdisciplinary connections, assumptions, possible research directions, and lightweight literature matrix or A+B paper-combination idea mapping'), but leads with a generic role statement ('Open-ended scientific ideation partner') and noun-phrase actions rather than verb-led verbs.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what (ideation partner + activity list) and when ('Use for...'), and adds an explicit when-not ('use hypothesis-generation instead').

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural scientific phrases ('research gaps', 'interdisciplinary connections', 'assumptions') are present, but the most likely user word 'brainstorm' is missing and 'A+B paper-combination idea mapping' reads as jargon rather than a natural trigger.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear scientific-ideation niche with explicit disambiguation against the related hypothesis-generation skill, minimizing conflict risk.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
foryourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.