Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An admirably lean, well-structured instruction-only skill whose guidance is specific about files and design preferences. It falls short on actionability: the one genuinely novel artifact — the item-level #[frb(...)] override — is never shown, and the CLI exposure step has no mechanism.
Suggestions
Add a minimal Rust snippet showing an item-level #[frb(...)] override in place, since that attribute is the skill's central mechanism.
Replace 'Expose the flag in the command-line interface' with the concrete command or yaml key that does the exposure.
Show one example test skeleton in frb_example/pure_dart demonstrating both enabled and disabled cases in the same package.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | About twenty lean lines with zero padding: every sentence is a directive ('Expose the flag in flutter_rust_bridge.yaml', 'Do not rely only on package-level config differences') and nothing explains concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete file paths (flutter_rust_bridge.yaml, frb_example/pure_dart) and a concrete attribute name are given, but key executable details are missing: no example of the '#[frb(...)]' override syntax, and 'Expose the flag in the command-line interface' specifies no command or mechanism. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The API-surface bullets flow into the test-coverage guidance in a clear order, and the simple-skill exception applies; minor gaps remain (whether CLI exposure is mandatory, how to confirm both flag states were exercised). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, single-purpose, no bundle files and no external references needed; the body is cleanly organized into API Surface and Test Coverage sections, which satisfies the simple-skill guideline. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |