Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-organized body that assumes competence and avoids explaining known concepts. The main gaps are heavy delegation to sibling skills rather than inlined executable specifics, and a regression workflow missing explicit validation/verification checkpoints.
Suggestions
Add an explicit verification checkpoint to the Regression Workflow (e.g., after the fix, confirm the same ./frb_internal command now passes at the red commit before opening the PR) to satisfy the validate->fix->retry expectation for batch CI operations.
Inline the most critical actions currently delegated to sibling skills (e.g., the key frb-fix-ci triage command or the gh-actions-live-logs invocation) so core guidance is executable without following another skill.
Make the reproduction command concrete by giving an example ./frb_internal invocation with representative arguments rather than the abstract './frb_internal ...' placeholder.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — it never explains what CI, a regression, or git bisect is — and every section earns its place with no padding, matching the 'lean and efficient' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives concrete git commands and specific triage categories, but most remediation delegates to sibling skills ('Read frb-fix-ci', 'Use gh-actions-live-logs') and the reproduction command './frb_internal ...' is abstract, so guidance is actionable but not copy-paste ready — matching the 'some concrete guidance but incomplete' anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The Regression Workflow is a clear numbered sequence (steps 1-6) with a guardrail list, but batch/destructive-adjacent CI operations lack explicit validation checkpoints or a validate->fix->retry loop, which caps workflow clarity at 2 per the rubric. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the content is under 50 lines with no need for external bundle references, yet it is organized into clear, well-signaled sections (Choose a Path, Path A/B, Regression Workflow, What Not To Do, PR Expectations), scoring 3 for a small well-organized skill. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |