Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, concise instruction skill with concrete commands and a clear two-path decision model. Its main gaps are placeholder reproduction commands and implied rather than explicit validate-fix-retry loops.
Suggestions
Make the bisect/reproduction validation loop explicit (e.g., 'reproduce at red, confirm green baseline passes, then iterate') to push workflow_clarity to 5.
Replace placeholder SHAs in the git examples with a concrete worked example or a note on how to obtain green/red SHAs from the workflow run.
Reference sibling skills with their skill path or a short hint of what they cover so navigation is unambiguous.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient; it delegates detail to sibling skills (frb-fix-ci, tom-ci, frb-prepare-pr) and avoids restating concepts Claude already knows, with every section earning its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete commands (git log/diff --stat), explicit classification lists, and specific PR expectations, but reproduction examples rely on placeholders (<green-sha>..<red-sha>) leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Regression Workflow is a clear numbered sequence with a bisect fallback and a validation checkpoint (reproduce at red but not green, question 4), though the validate->fix->retry loop is implied rather than fully explicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into distinct sections (Choose a Path, Regression Workflow, What Not To Do, PR Expectations) with signaled sibling-skill references and no nested bundles, but the body slightly exceeds the simple-skill 50-line threshold and references skills by name without paths. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |