Content
87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A clean, highly actionable single-purpose skill with excellent conciseness and structure. Its only meaningful gap is the absence of a validation/verification step for the auto-fixing batch command, which caps workflow clarity.
Suggestions
Add a verification checkpoint after "./frb_internal lint --fix", e.g. instruct to review the resulting diff and run the test suite before committing, so the batch auto-fix has a feedback loop.
Briefly note what to do when a lint check fails (fix and re-run, or report the unfixable finding) to give the workflow an explicit error-recovery path.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and efficient — a compact command table and a four-item list with no concept explanation or padding; every token earns its place and it assumes Claude's competence. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready, fully executable commands (e.g. "./frb_internal lint --fix") covering the common dart/rust splits, matching the anchor for fully executable guidance with specific examples. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The recommended "./frb_internal lint --fix" is a batch operation that auto-modifies files across the project, yet the skill provides no validation/verification checkpoint (e.g. review the diff or run tests); per the rubric's destructive/batch cap this limits the score to 3 even though the single action is otherwise unambiguous. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with well-organized sections (Quick Reference, What Lint Includes) and a single clearly-signaled one-level reference to the frb-dev-env skill; no nested or buried references, and no bundle files are needed. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |