Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a model of lean, executable skill content — a terse command table plus an exact inventory of what runs, with no filler. The only gap is around the auto-fix path: a one-line note on reviewing '--fix' changes or re-running lint to confirm a clean pass would close the validation gap.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is ~26 lines of pure signal: a prerequisite pointer, a four-row command table, and a four-item list of what lint covers. No padding, no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Four copy-paste-ready commands ('./frb_internal lint --fix', './frb_internal lint', './frb_internal lint-dart', './frb_internal lint-rust') cover the common cases including the recommended default and per-language variants, with a concrete enumeration of the underlying checks. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | As a simple single-purpose skill the command choice is unambiguous, but the recommended '--fix' path rewrites files across the repo with no guidance on reviewing the auto-applied changes or what to do when lint failures remain. Clear sequence, minor validation gap — fits 'clear sequence with most checkpoints' rather than the explicit-validation anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references, and the two sections ('Quick Reference', 'What Lint Includes') are well-organized. The 'frb-dev-env' mention is a clearly signaled sibling-skill prerequisite, not a buried or nested bundle reference. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |