CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

frb-manual-test

Use when adding, executing, reviewing, or updating flutter_rust_bridge manual test reports under tools/manual_tests for scenarios that require human or agent-driven manual verification.

80

Quality

100%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured procedural skill: concrete commands and paths, an explicitly gated multi-step workflow with error recovery, and clean separation between the overview and the template files that hold the detailed report shape.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Dense, actionable instruction that assumes Claude's competence; it scopes repo-specific behavior rather than explaining generic concepts Claude already knows, and every section earns its place.

3 / 3

Actionability

Provides concrete copy commands, specific path examples, kebab-case naming patterns, and explicit pass-indicator strings ('All tests passed!', 'test result: ok', simulator UDIDs) — copy-paste ready guidance.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The numbered 'Reviewable Workflow Gate' is explicitly sequenced with a validation gate and feedback loop ('If gist upload... fails... report... blocked until a gist... can be created'), plus an explicit cleanup step.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

SKILL.md acts as an overview that defers detailed report shape to bundled templates ('The detailed content requirements live in test-template.md'), with well-signaled, one-level-deep references and no nested indirection.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A precise, third-person/imperative description with an explicit 'Use when' trigger, multiple concrete actions, and a clearly bounded niche. It answers what, when, and for whom without fluff or over-claiming.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names four concrete actions ('adding, executing, reviewing, or updating') against a specific domain ('flutter_rust_bridge manual test reports under tools/manual_tests'), matching the anchor for multiple specific concrete actions.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both what ('adding, executing, reviewing, or updating... manual test reports') and when ('Use when... for scenarios that require human or agent-driven manual verification') with an explicit trigger.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Uses an explicit 'Use when...' frame with natural niche terms a user would say ('manual test reports', 'manual verification', 'adding/executing/reviewing/updating'), giving good coverage rather than only jargon.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Targets a narrow, specific niche (FRB manual test reports under tools/manual_tests requiring human/agent-driven verification) with distinct triggers, making conflict with other skills unlikely.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
fzyzcjy/flutter_rust_bridge
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.