frb-pr-review

Review a flutter_rust_bridge PR before treating it as ready, including subagent checks for correctness and test weakening plus Gemini review.

Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A tight, well-structured review workflow with concrete steps, explicit validation gates, and clean one-level reference to another skill for shared detail. No bundle files are present or needed.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	Lean ~35-line body with no re-explanation of concepts Claude knows; every line is directive and earns its place.	3 / 3
Actionability	Concrete directives throughout — 'inspect the PR diff against the PR base', require findings 'with file paths, line numbers, impact, and suggested fix', and 'Post /gemini review'.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	Numbered 4-step sequence with an explicit Stop Condition validation gate and feedback loops (re-validate, request another Gemini pass after fixes).	3 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	Well-organized sections (Review Gate, Stop Condition) with a single one-level reference to sdev-pass-test for test-weakening details; no nested references.	3 / 3
	Total	12 / 12 Passed

Description

85%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A specific, well-scoped description that covers what and when with concrete actions. Trigger terms are accurate but somewhat specialized, lacking broader natural phrasings.

Suggestions

Add a 'Use when ...' clause with natural user phrasings (e.g., 'Use when reviewing or approving a flutter_rust_bridge PR') to broaden trigger coverage.

Include common variation terms users might say, such as 'approve', 'merge readiness', or 'FRB PR', alongside 'review'.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists multiple concrete actions — 'subagent checks for correctness and test weakening plus Gemini review' — rather than vague language.	3 / 3
Completeness	Answers both what (review with subagent correctness/test-weakening checks and Gemini review) and when ('before treating it as ready').	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Solid domain keywords ('flutter_rust_bridge PR', 'review', 'Gemini review') but specialized; lacks common natural variations a user might say.	2 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Scoped to a clear niche ('flutter_rust_bridge PR') with distinct triggers, unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.	3 / 3
	Total	11 / 12 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: fzyzcjy/flutter_rust_bridge
Path: .claude/skills/frb-pr-review/SKILL.md
Commit: 1d5348b

Reviewed: 5 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.