Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, well-structured, and provides a clear review workflow with explicit validation checkpoints and a stop condition. The only minor gap is the lack of concrete mechanics for spawning subagents.
Suggestions
Add a brief concrete example of how to spawn the review subagents (e.g. the agent tool invocation or prompt template) to lift actionability toward 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean prose with no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place and assumes Claude's competence. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance with specific focus lists and required finding fields, plus pointers to sdev-pass-test; minor gaps in the mechanical details of how to spawn subagents. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced gate with two review paths and an explicit stop-condition checklist (no unresolved findings, no unjustified weakening, CI green) acting as validation checkpoints. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A focused, well-sectioned single-purpose skill under 50 lines with clear navigation; external skill references are one level deep and clearly signaled. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |