CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

frb-test

Use when needing to run tests locally in flutter_rust_bridge, or when debugging test failures before pushing

76

Quality

95%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A tight, action-oriented reference skill: executable commands dominate, the workflow guidance includes explicit checkpoints, and the single-file structure is appropriately organized with no unnecessary external references.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean: a command quick-reference table and focused notes (web-test requirements, when to test, CI discipline) with no padding explaining what tests or CI are; every section earns its tokens.

3 / 3

Actionability

Concrete, copy-paste-ready commands populate the table (e.g. './frb_internal test-rust-package --package frb_rust') and the web-tests section supplies exact rustup/wasm-pack invocations.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The CI Discipline section sequences the work (choose tests by blast radius, push, monitor GitHub Actions until a terminal state, inspect logs and fix or report) with an explicit checkpoint and failure-handling guidance.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is self-contained with no bundle files and clear section organization (Overview, Quick Reference, Web Tests, When to Test Locally, CI Discipline); no nested references are needed at this scope.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

90%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A concise, well-scoped description with an explicit trigger and natural vocabulary; its only weakness is that the action list is narrow rather than enumerating multiple concrete capabilities.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain (flutter_rust_bridge) and two related actions ('run tests locally', 'debugging test failures'), but does not enumerate multiple distinct concrete actions like the level-3 anchor; coverage is functional rather than comprehensive.

2 / 3

Completeness

The explicit 'Use when...' clause answers when to invoke the skill, and 'run tests locally in flutter_rust_bridge' / 'debugging test failures' answer what it does, satisfying both halves.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Phrases like 'run tests locally', 'debugging test failures', and 'before pushing' are natural terms a user would actually say, giving good coverage of common variations.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Scoping to flutter_rust_bridge with test-specific triggers carves out a clear niche unlikely to fire for unrelated testing skills.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
fzyzcjy/flutter_rust_bridge
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.