CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

speckit-git-commit

Disabled — commits are performed manually by the user, never by Spec Kit

57

Quality

66%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.claude/skills/speckit-git-commit/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is speckit-git-commit in g14wx/staffSync

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is a well-structured, concise policy document that gives concrete no-op behavior and a clear, validated re-enable path. Its main weakness is mild redundancy around the 'never commit' message and slightly abstract phrasing in the re-enable restoration steps.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is efficient and well-sectioned with minimal padding, though it restates 'never commit / do not commit' several times and the Rationale mildly over-explains discipline that Claude could infer.

4 / 5

Actionability

It gives concrete, executable instructions (return without running `git add`/`git commit`; do not read `git-config.yml`; optional emit line; re-enable via `auto-commit.sh`/`auto-commit.ps1`) with only minor abstraction in 'restore the original logic'.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Both the no-op Behavior and Re-enabling workflows are clearly numbered and sequenced, and the re-enable path includes a validation checkpoint ('Confirm the commit message template matches task.md before enabling'); only minor validation gaps remain.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is under 50 lines, single-purpose, and organized into clearly labeled sections (Behavior, Rationale, Execution, Re-enabling) with no need for external bundle references, matching the simple-skill exception for a 5.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is clear and honest about its disabled/no-op nature and is well-scoped to Spec Kit commits, but it omits any explicit 'when to use' trigger guidance and has limited keyword coverage. It reads as a policy notice more than a capability/trigger description.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when a Spec Kit command would otherwise auto-commit; this skill blocks all automatic commits.'

Broaden natural trigger terms to include 'git commit', 'auto-commit', and 'staging changes' alongside 'commits'.

State the concrete behavior more directly (e.g. 'No-op hook: returns immediately without staging or committing') to lift specificity.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain (commits) and one concrete behavior ('performed manually by the user, never by Spec Kit'), but offers only a single action rather than a comprehensive list, matching the 'domain + 1-2 concrete actions' anchor.

3 / 5

Completeness

It has a clear 'what' (disabled; commits are manual, never by Spec Kit) but no explicit 'Use when...' or equivalent trigger clause, which per the guidelines caps completeness at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

It surfaces relevant natural terms ('commits', 'manually', 'Spec Kit') but lacks common variations or synonyms (e.g., 'git commit', 'auto-commit'), matching the 'some relevant keywords but missing variations' anchor.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The 'Spec Kit' qualifier gives it a clear niche distinct from generic git-commit skills, with only minor overlap risk, sitting above the 'somewhat specific' anchor and below a fully comprehensive trigger set.

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
g14wx/staffSync
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.