CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

speckit-tasks

Generate an actionable, dependency-ordered tasks.md for the feature based on available design artifacts.

53

Quality

67%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.claude/skills/speckit-tasks/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is a thorough, largely executable specification for generating a dependency-ordered tasks.md, with concrete commands, templates, and a strict checklist format validated by example. Its main weaknesses are the verbatim duplication of the extension-hook blocks and unspecified output formats for the dependency graph. Consolidating the hook logic and trimming the Outline/Rules overlap would raise both conciseness and workflow clarity.

Suggestions

Factor the before_tasks/after_tasks hook blocks into one shared procedure referenced with "repeat the hook-check procedure with the hooks.after_tasks key" to remove ~30 duplicated lines.

Specify the concrete output format for the dependencies section and parallel-execution examples the way the checklist format is specified, since these are required outputs with no template.

Add a feedback loop to the Report step: what to do when format validation fails (e.g. regenerate the offending tasks against the checklist before finishing).

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is densely operational with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, but the ~30-line extension-hook machinery is duplicated nearly verbatim for before_tasks and after_tasks, and Outline step 4 overlaps the Task Generation Rules section. This is more than minor padding, so it fits the "could be tightened" anchor rather than the efficient anchor.

3 / 5

Actionability

Concrete guidance throughout: the exact script invocation ".specify/scripts/bash/check-prerequisites.sh --json", the template path ".specify/templates/tasks-template.md", literal hook output templates, and a checklist format with correct/incorrect examples. Minor gaps remain: the dependency-graph and dependencies-section formats are never specified and "Validate task completeness" is abstract, keeping it below fully copy-paste-ready.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear numbered sequence (Setup, Load design documents, Execute task generation workflow, Generate tasks.md, Report, post-hooks) includes an explicit format-validation checkpoint in the Report step. It misses anchor 5 because there is no feedback loop describing what to do if format validation fails.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is a single file (no bundle files exist) with well-organized sections and clear headers throughout. The ~60 lines of duplicated hook-handling instructions arguably belong in a shared reference or factored into one parameterized block, which is a minor organization gap rather than a structural failure.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description communicates a clear deliverable but reads more like a command summary than a skill description. It lacks any "Use when..." trigger guidance and natural trigger terms, which caps both completeness and trigger-term quality. It is narrowly scoped to the spec-kit context, which keeps conflict risk low.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. "Use when the user asks to generate or break down implementation tasks for a spec-kit feature, or mentions tasks.md, task breakdown, or task list."

Drop the buzzword "actionable" in favor of one more concrete capability, e.g. "organized into setup, foundational, and per-user-story phases with dependencies and parallel-execution marks."

Include natural synonyms users would say ("task breakdown", "task list", "implementation tasks") to improve trigger-term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Generate an actionable, dependency-ordered tasks.md for the feature based on available design artifacts" names the domain and deliverable with one concrete action, but lists no additional concrete actions and leans on the buzzword "actionable". It matches the 1-2-concrete-actions anchor, not the several-actions anchors above.

3 / 5

Completeness

The "what" is clear (generate a dependency-ordered tasks.md from design artifacts), but there is no "Use when..." clause or equivalent trigger guidance, capping completeness at 3 per the judging guidelines. The "when" is only weakly implied by "based on available design artifacts".

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Keywords like "tasks.md", "design artifacts", and "dependency-ordered" are relevant, but common user phrasings such as "task breakdown", "task list", or "create tasks from the spec" are absent. Some relevant keywords with missing variations fits anchor 3 better than the broader coverage of anchor 4.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The references to "tasks.md" and "design artifacts" tie the description to the spec-kit workflow niche, giving mostly distinct triggers with only minor overlap risk against generic task-planning skills. It falls short of anchor 5 because explicit trigger phrases would be needed for minimal conflict risk.

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository

g14wx/staffSync

Path

.claude/skills/speckit-tasks/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.