Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, highly actionable protocol: exact naming rules, a complete template, an unambiguous read procedure, and a table clarifying how handoffs relate to other project files. Only minor conciseness trims and the absence of any bundle split keep it from full marks.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient — the naming convention, template, and reading procedure all earn their tokens, with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows. Minor redundancy keeps it from a 5: the lexicographic-sort-equals-latest rule is stated in both the naming and reading sections, and the read-only-the-latest rule appears three times (intro, writing, reading). | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully concrete for an instruction-only skill: an exact filename pattern with worked examples, a copy-paste-ready markdown template with per-section placeholders and fallback lines ("Nothing in progress.", "No special context."), and a numbered reading procedure. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Both workflows are clearly sequenced: writing has explicit trigger conditions (feature complete, session ends mid-feature, explicit /handoff) plus a self-containment rule, and reading is an unambiguous 5-step list with the read-only-latest guard as an explicit correctness checkpoint. No destructive or batch operations are involved, so no validation loop is required. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single self-contained file with well-organized, clearly headed sections (naming, writing, reading, relation to other files) and no nested references. At ~127 lines the under-50-line auto-5 exception doesn't apply, and all inline content is needed on every invocation, so the structure is good but not maximally split. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |