Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with a clear, validated decision workflow, but it is a long monolithic document with notable internal repetition and no bundle files to offload detail, capping conciseness and progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Collapse the repeated 'no hardcoded directory table' rationale into a single Hard Rules entry and reference it elsewhere rather than restating it four times.
Move the book sub-category enumeration and drift-detection command details into a reference bundle file (e.g. references/drift-detection.md) and link to it one level deep to improve progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~175-line body is mostly domain-specific and useful, but restates the 'no hardcoded directory table' point across Contract, Critical, Anti-Patterns, and Hard Rules and includes light over-justification, so it could be tightened — anchor 2. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable commands ('gbrain schema show --json | jq ...', 'gbrain schema review-orphans --json', 'gbrain doctor --json | jq ...'), a numbered decision protocol, output templates, and a validation checklist — copy-paste ready, anchor 3. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 5-step Decision Protocol has an explicit validation checklist (Step 5) and an error-recovery branch (no match -> signal EIIRP Phase 3, not closest-fit), plus a drift-detection feedback loop — anchor 3. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the ~175-line body is a monolithic SKILL.md; sections are well-organized but content that could be split (book sub-categories, drift details) is inline with no one-level-deep reference files — anchor 2. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |