Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an efficient, well-sequenced 7-phase pipeline with strong validation checkpoints and an explicit anti-hallucination integrity rule. It is mostly actionable and well-structured, with minor room to tighten phrasing and make the single external reference more clearly signaled.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — terse bullet lists with no padding about what email or PDFs are — with only minor instances (e.g., "Brain first (maybe we already have this data)") that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance via named tools (put_raw_data, file_upload, add_link) and explicit dedup decision branches with a markdown output example, though exact tool-call syntax is not given, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-phase sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (the EXTRACTION INTEGRITY RULE: save raw first, re-read from saved files) and a documented failure mode, providing strong feedback loops for a batch operation. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with one-level-deep, clearly signaled references to built-in recipes at ~/.gbrain/recipes/ and skills/conventions/quality.md; no bundle files present, and the convention reference is a bare path with only light signaling. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |