eiirp

Everything In Its Right Place. The universal post-work organizer. After any significant work session, EIIRP runs a 7-phase audit: (1) inventory every output, (2) walk taxonomy to decide where each lands, (3) check schema-pack consistency against the brain's actual shape, (4) file enriched brain pages, (5) audit the skill graph for DRY+MECE, (6) verify resolvability, (7) report. Named after the Radiohead song. Nothing produced during significant work lives only in chat — knowledge becomes permanent, patterns become reusable.

Quality

68%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/eiirp/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

77%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable with executable commands and a clearly sequenced 7-phase workflow including validation checkpoints. Its main weaknesses are internal redundancy (Output Format vs Phase 7; Hard Rules vs Anti-Patterns) and a monolithic structure with no progressive disclosure to reference files.

Suggestions

Collapse the 'Output Format' section into Phase 7 (or vice versa) — they are near-duplicate templates and the redundancy costs tokens.

Consolidate 'Hard Rules' with 'Anti-Patterns' since they restate the same constraints, or move one into a reference file.

Move the detailed brain-page template and the changelog into a references/ file, keeping SKILL.md a lean overview with clearly signaled one-level-deep links.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is mostly concrete and earns its tokens, but the 'Output Format' section near-duplicates the Phase 7 REPORT template and 'Hard Rules' restates 'Anti-Patterns', so it could be tightened.	2 / 3
Actionability	It provides fully executable gbrain commands ('gbrain schema show --json', 'gbrain check-resolvable', 'gbrain doctor --json', 'gbrain sync'), concrete filing-plan tables, page templates, and copy-paste-ready checklists.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	A clear 7-phase sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (Phase 6 'check-resolvable', 'doctor', link-resolve verification) and an explicit confidence-floor gate, satisfying the destructive/batch validation requirement.	3 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	Sections are well-organized, but the skill is monolithic (~330 lines, no bundle files) and content that could be split out — brain-page template, anti-patterns, hard rules, changelog — is inline rather than in one-level-deep reference files.	2 / 3
	Total	10 / 12 Passed

Description

60%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong on specificity with a concrete 7-phase breakdown, but lacks an explicit 'Use when…' trigger clause and relies on the separate triggers field for natural keyword coverage. Distinctiveness is decent but the 'universal post-work organizer' framing risks overlap with generic organizers.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when…' clause that names 2–3 natural trigger phrases (e.g., 'Use after a deep research thread or when the user says "organize this", "DRY this up", or "make this re-doable"') so completeness and trigger coverage don't depend on the separate triggers list.

Fold the most common natural trigger terms directly into the description to broaden trigger-term coverage beyond the single 'Everything In Its Right Place' phrase.

Sharpen the niche framing — e.g., lead with 'post-work knowledge AND capability organizer' — to reduce overlap with single-domain organizing skills.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	The description enumerates seven concrete phases — '(1) inventory every output, (2) walk taxonomy to decide where each lands, (3) check schema-pack consistency…(7) report' — naming multiple specific actions rather than vague language.	3 / 3
Completeness	It clearly answers 'what' (the 7-phase audit) but the 'when' is only implied by 'After any significant work session' with no explicit 'Use when…' clause, capping completeness at 2 per the guideline.	2 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	The description embeds the natural phrase 'Everything In Its Right Place' and 'post-work organizer', but within the description field alone it covers only a couple of natural terms and misses common variations that live in the separate triggers list.	2 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The 7-phase post-work audit framing is a clear niche, but 'the universal post-work organizer' is somewhat generic and could still overlap with other organizing/filing skills.	2 / 3
	Total	9 / 12 Passed

Validation

87%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning
referenced_paths_exist	Referenced path issues: 1 missing	Warning

	Total	14 / 16 Passed

Repository: garrytan/gbrain
Path: skills/eiirp/SKILL.md
Commit: 3fafb69

Reviewed: about 21 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.