CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

skill-optimizer

Self-evolving skill optimization via SkillOpt-paper-grounded text-space optimizer.

53

Quality

60%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/skill-optimizer/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Skill Optimizer

Self-evolving skill optimization. Treats SKILL.md as the trainable parameters of a frozen agent. Validation-gated, budget-capped, atomic-versioned.

Based on SkillOpt (arXiv 2605.23904, Microsoft Research, May 2026).

When to invoke this skill

The user wants to:

  • Improve an existing skill's execution quality against a benchmark
  • Bootstrap a benchmark file for a new skill
  • Re-tune a skill after switching target models

Iron Law

  • Validation gating is MANDATORY. Every candidate must clear median-of-3
    • epsilon=0.05 margin against the sel-set before SKILL.md gets rewritten.
  • Frontmatter mutation is FORBIDDEN. The optimizer only edits the body. Routing surface (triggers:, brain_first:) stays invariant.
  • Bundled skills require explicit opt-in AND an independent held-out set. Skills shipping with gbrain cannot be auto-mutated. To rewrite one in place the user passes BOTH --allow-mutate-bundled AND --held-out <path> with at least 5 benchmark-disjoint tasks; without the held-out set the run hard-refuses (exit 2). Drop --allow-mutate-bundled (or pass --no-mutate, the default for the dream-cycle phase) to write proposed.md for review instead — no held-out needed for review-only output.
  • Bootstrap output requires human review. Both --bootstrap-from-skill and --bootstrap-from-routing write a sentinel; you must review + STRENGTHEN the generated judges, delete the sentinel, and re-run with --bootstrap-reviewed before optimization can use the file.

The pipeline

gbrain skillopt <skill-name> [flags]
  │
  ├── Pre-flight gates
  │     ├── working tree clean (or --force)
  │     ├── benchmark valid + D_sel >= 5 (D17)
  │     ├── cost preflight (D3) — refuses over --max-cost-usd
  │     └── per-skill DB lock (D14)
  │
  ├── Baseline eval on D_sel (sets best_sel_score)
  │
  ├── for epoch in 1..N:
  │     for step in 1..steps_per_epoch:
  │       ├── forward pass: rollouts on D_train batch
  │       ├── backward pass: reflect × 2 (failures + successes per D7)
  │       ├── rank + clip via LR cosine schedule
  │       ├── apply edits (body-only per D5, tagged result per D9)
  │       ├── validation gate: median-of-3 + epsilon=0.05 (D12)
  │       └── if accept: commit via D8 history-intent-first
  │     │
  │     └── slow update (D6) if no improvement this epoch
  │
  └── Final test eval on D_test → run receipt

Starting a benchmark from the skill itself (the common case)

The user will NOT hand-write a benchmark, and you shouldn't start from a blank file either. When the user says "make skill X better" and skills/X/skillopt-benchmark.jsonl doesn't exist, generate a starter from the SKILL.md directly:

  1. Generate the starter. Run:
    gbrain skillopt X --bootstrap-from-skill
    One LLM call reads skills/X/SKILL.md, infers what the skill produces and what "good" looks like, and writes ~15 tasks (each with rule judges) to skills/X/skillopt-benchmark.jsonl plus a # BOOTSTRAP_PENDING_REVIEW sentinel. No routing-eval.jsonl is needed. Tune the count with --bootstrap-tasks N (max 50).
  2. Review AND STRENGTHEN the judges. This is YOUR job and it is load-bearing. The generated rule checks are weak drafts — the model tends to emit generic contains, loose max_chars, or invented headings. Read each task, fix soft checks, add the must-haves the skill actually requires (real section names, real length ceilings, min_citations where sources are expected, tool_called/tool_not_called for tools the skill genuinely uses). A thin benchmark optimizes for a thin definition of quality — do not rubber-stamp.
  3. Delete the sentinel line (# BOOTSTRAP_PENDING_REVIEW, the last line).
  4. Run the optimizer with --split 1:1:1:
    gbrain skillopt X --bootstrap-reviewed --split 1:1:1
    The 1:1:1 split is REQUIRED for a 15-task starter — the default 4:1:5 makes the validation set floor(15/10)=1, below the D_sel >= 5 floor, and the optimizer refuses with d_sel_too_small. (4:1:5 needs ~50 tasks.) Add --dry-run first to preview cost.

Benchmark line shape (what the generator writes, one per line):

{"task_id":"x-001","task":"<user prompt>","judge":{"kind":"rule","checks":[{"op":"max_chars","arg":1800},{"op":"contains","arg":"agenda"}]}}

Rule-check vocabulary you'll strengthen with: contains, regex, section_present, max_chars, min_citations, tool_called, tool_not_called. Rule judges are deterministic and free, but shallow for skills whose quality is sequencing, privacy, refusal boundaries, or file placement — for those, hand-add richer checks (or an llm judge) during review.

Fallback — author freehand. If the generated starter is poor (rare, but possible for very behavior-shaped skills), discard it and write the JSONL yourself: read the SKILL.md, write ~15 realistic tasks covering the boring middle, attach >=2 rule checks each, save to skills/X/skillopt-benchmark.jsonl, run with --split 1:1:1. The human walkthrough lives at docs/tutorials/improving-skills-with-skillopt.md.

Decision tree

SituationAction
Skill has no benchmarkgbrain skillopt foo --bootstrap-from-skill → review + strengthen the judges → delete sentinel → gbrain skillopt foo --bootstrap-reviewed --split 1:1:1 (see section above)
Skill has a routing-eval.jsonl and you want a head startgbrain skillopt foo --bootstrap-from-routing → review the generated tasks → --bootstrap-reviewed (routing tasks test dispatch; tighten them into quality tasks before trusting)
Iterating on an existing skillgbrain skillopt foo --benchmark skills/foo/skillopt-benchmark.jsonl
Costly run, want previewAdd --dry-run
Bundled skill (skills/ in gbrain repo)Default writes proposed.md; to commit in place add --allow-mutate-bundled AND --held-out <path> (>=5 benchmark-disjoint tasks) — else it hard-refuses
Want to review changes before applyingAdd --no-mutate (writes proposed.md, no held-out needed)
Guard against benchmark overfittingAdd --held-out <path> — a candidate that beats the benchmark but regresses on the held-out set is refused
Mid-run crashgbrain skillopt foo --resume <run-id>

Output Format

When invoked, this skill produces:

  • Updated skills/<name>/SKILL.md (when mutation is allowed)
  • skills/<name>/skillopt/best.md — pointer copy of current best
  • skills/<name>/skillopt/versions/vNNNN_eN_sN.md — per-step snapshots
  • skills/<name>/skillopt/history.json — append-only run record
  • skills/<name>/skillopt/rejected.json — bounded LRU of rejected edits
  • ~/.gbrain/audit/skillopt-YYYY-Www.jsonl — ISO-week-rotated audit trail

Anti-Patterns

  • Don't bypass the validation gate. The median-of-3 + epsilon=0.05 is load-bearing; without it, the optimizer accepts noise as improvement.
  • Don't optimize bundled skills without --allow-mutate-bundled AND --held-out. They ship with gbrain and are load-bearing for downstream agents. In-place mutation requires both flags (held-out >=5 benchmark-disjoint tasks); without the held-out set the run hard-refuses and points you at proposed.md.
  • Don't use bootstrap output without strengthening it. Both --bootstrap-from-skill and --bootstrap-from-routing have the optimizer model invent success criteria — generic and weak by default. Review and tighten the judges before SkillOpt optimizes against them, or it trains the skill toward benchmark artifacts instead of real quality.
  • Don't skip --split 1:1:1 on a ~15-task starter. The default 4:1:5 split drops the validation set below the D_sel >= 5 floor and the run aborts with d_sel_too_small.

Contract

runSkillOpt(opts) returns:

{
  outcome: 'accepted' | 'no_improvement' | 'aborted' | 'errored',
  receipt: {
    run_id, skill_sha8, benchmark_sha8, models, cost,
    baseline_sel_score, best_sel_score,   // real measured baseline (no longer hardcoded 0)
    baseline_test_score, test_score,      // final held-out test-split eval
  },
  finalText: string,
  mutatedSkillFile: boolean,
  proposedPath?: string
}

Related skills

  • skillify — scaffolds a new skill (use BEFORE skillopt)
  • skillpack-check — audits skill conformance (item 13 surfaces skillopt status)
  • conventions/quality.md — output quality standards skillopt enforces via judges
Repository
garrytan/gbrain
Last updated
First committed

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.