CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

skillpack-harvest

Lift a proven skill from a host repo (e.g. your OpenClaw fork) back into gbrain's bundle so other clients can scaffold it. Editorial workflow: the CLI does the file copy + privacy lint; this skill drives the judgment-heavy genericization (scrub real names, generalize triggers, lift fork-specific conventions to references).

56

Quality

66%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/skillpack-harvest/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured, actionable workflow with strong validation and feedback loops; its main weakness is redundancy across the Anti-Patterns, 'What harvest does NOT do', and inline notes that inflates length.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient operational guidance that assumes Claude's competence, but the 'Anti-Patterns', 'What harvest does NOT do', and Phase 2 dry-run note repeat the same points (copy-not-move, don't skip dry-run) and could be tightened.

3 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete executable commands (gbrain skillpack harvest ... --dry-run, bun test ..., gbrain skillpack check --strict) and specific scrub examples (garry -> the user, acme-example, #some-channel); not a 5 because slug/host placeholders and the human-driven editorial pass leave minor gaps.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Six clearly sequenced phases with explicit validation checkpoints (dry-run, privacy lint with rollback, Phase 5 verify), a feedback loop (lint_failed -> back to Phase 3), and a checklist for the complex editorial pass; the destructive/batch cap does not apply since validation is present and batch is unsupported.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Single-file skill with no bundle references, organized into clear navigable sections (Contract, Workflow phases, Bypass, etc.); not a 5 because of length and redundancy between the Anti-Patterns and 'What harvest does NOT do' sections.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

58%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly conveys what the skill does with concrete actions and a distinct niche, but lacks an explicit 'when to use' clause and the natural trigger synonyms that would help users discover it.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause, e.g. 'Use when the user wants to harvest or publish a proven host skill upstream into gbrain's bundle so other clients can scaffold it.'

Weave natural trigger terms (harvest, publish, promote, share) into the description so the wording matches what users actually say.

Clarify the boundary from the scaffold skill in one phrase (e.g. 'inverse of scaffold') to reduce overlap confusion.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and several concrete actions ('the CLI does the file copy + privacy lint', 'scrub real names, generalize triggers, lift fork-specific conventions to references'); not a 5 because it omits the verification/landing step from the action list.

4 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is clear and concrete, but there is no explicit 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance, which caps completeness at 3 per the judging guidelines.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Contains relevant keywords ('Lift a proven skill', 'host repo', 'scaffold') but is missing the natural synonyms users say (harvest, publish, promote, share) that appear only in the triggers array.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Carves a distinct niche (editorial genericization of a proven skill upstream into gbrain's bundle), but the phrase 'so other clients can scaffold it' introduces minor overlap risk with the scaffold skill.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

relative_links

Relative link issues: 1 suspicious

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
garrytan/gbrain
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.