Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with well-sequenced, validated workflows and concrete commands, but it is monolithic with no reference files and repeats credential/readiness rules across sections. Splitting layout, brand-profile, and failure-reference detail into bundled reference files would improve progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Move the layout-module decision frame and per-module syntax guidance into a references file (e.g. LAYOUT.md) and link to it one level deep, keeping only the routing rule inline.
Deduplicate the credential/readiness rules: state them once in 'Configuration Boundaries' and reference that section elsewhere instead of restating API-key and WeChat-credential requirements multiple times.
Extract Brand Profile and Failure Handling detail into separate reference files to reduce the body length and give each topic a clear navigation entry point.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and command-focused without explaining basics Claude already knows, but credential/readiness rules and the readiness-gate paragraph repeat across 'Configuration Boundaries', 'Article Workflow', and 'Publishing Side Effects' and could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready CLI commands with flags and --json output guidance throughout, plus specific error codes (CONFIG_INVALID, PREVIEW_ACTION_REQUIRED, 45004) and exact field paths like data.readiness.targets/blockers. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Multi-step workflows (Article Workflow 1-4, Formatting Protocol 1-8) are explicitly sequenced with validation checkpoints (inspect readiness gates, layout validate, doctor) and feedback loops (layout validate -> layout show -> fix -> re-validate) for destructive/publish side effects. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are clearly headed and navigable, but no bundle reference files exist and substantial detail (layout module decision frame, Brand Profile, failure handling) is inlined in a ~200-line monolithic file rather than split into one-level-deep references. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |