Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, well-structured instruction body: no wasted tokens, strong progressive disclosure via routing tables, and a sequenced workflow with approval, pilot-test, and verification checkpoints appropriate to a destructive-capable CRM skill. Weakest points are the absence of example analysis commands beyond install/help and only implicit error-recovery loops.
Suggestions
Include one concrete example invocation of an analysis command (beyond install and -h), e.g. a representative `deepline <job>` call with flags, so the core work is copy-paste ready.
Make the error-recovery loop explicit, e.g. "If verification fails: re-inspect failed rows, adjust the proposal, and re-run verification before proceeding" rather than only "Inspect failed rows before claiming completion."
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and lean with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows — e.g. "Find defects. Show evidence and proposed repairs. Keep unknown results visible." and "An absent property is not an observed blank." Every sentence carries a rule or instruction, fully assuming Claude's competence. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Executable commands are present ("npm install -g deepline", "deepline -h", "deepline --help") and the 13-step workflow plus the ordered domain-check sequence ("URL role, host normalization, DNS, MX, website routing, and legal pages") are concrete, but the actual analysis commands are deferred to live help rather than shown, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 13-step sequence with real checkpoints for a batch/destructive-capable skill: approval gating ("Take no external action without explicit customer approval"), a pilot gate ("test at most two records within the cost limit"), schema check before interpretation, and separation of observations/execution/verification. Error-recovery feedback loops (what to do after a failed validation or failed row) remain implicit, so it sits just below the explicit-feedback-loop anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Exemplary overview-plus-routing structure: a job-selection table ("Read other files only for the selected job"), a "Read when" reference table, and a bundled-plays table, all pointing one level deep to per-topic files with nothing bulk inlined — matching the well-signaled one-level-deep reference pattern. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |