CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

deepline-gtm

GTM leads, enrichment, outreach, Plays, developer signals/Reo.dev. Providers: adyntel,affinity,ai_ark,akta,allegrow,amplemarket,apify,attention,attio,aviato,bettercontact,bigquery,bluesky,bounceban,brave,browserbase,builtwith,buyercaddy,cbinsights,clay,clickhouse,cloudflare,contactout,contextdev,crunchbase,crustdata-v3,customer_db,databricks,dataforseo,datagma,dealroom,deepline_ip_to_company,deepline_native,deeplineagent,deepseek,discolike,dnb,edges,emailbison,emailguard,enformion,enigma,exa,findymail,firecrawl,fireflies,firmable,forager,fullenrich,fundable,generic_http,getleads,gong,google_ads_audiences,google_workspace,govfiles,grain,hackernews,harvestapi,heyreach,hubspot,hunter,icypeas,instantly,intercom,ipqs,kaspr,kernel,kickbox,leadmagic,lemlist,limadata,linkedin_ads_audiences,luma,lusha,meerapi,meta_audiences,millionverifier,nooks,notion,openmart,opensosdata,openwebninja,outreach,parallel,particle,peopledatalabs,pitchbook,podscan,polymarket,postgres,predictleads,prospeo,quickenrich,rapidapi,….

Quality

76%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Failed to scan

The risk profile of this skill

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/deepline-gtm/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is an exceptionally actionable, well-sequenced operating manual: exact commands, runnable code, explicit test/validate/approve checkpoints for paid batch work, and clear error-recovery guidance. Its one serious structural defect is that every deep-dive reference points to files absent from the bundle, and the bundle files that do exist are orphaned with no entry point from the overview.

Suggestions

Fix the broken reference layer: the 10 linked files (recipes/account-orgchart.md, recipes/build-tam.md, recipes/clay-to-deepline.md, recipes/developer-signals.md, recipes/deepline-monitors.md, recipes/find-qualified-titles.md, recipes/portfolio-prospecting.md, recipes/small-business-prospecting.md, writing-outreach.md) do not exist in this bundle — either ship them or repoint the links to the files that are present.

Add navigation to the existing bundle contents: references/monitor-operations.md and references/monitor-contract-reference.md (monitor lookup material for Section 6), references/run-events.md (run logs/receipts for Section 3), and the scripts/ utilities are currently unreachable from SKILL.md.

Break the Section 6 monitors paragraph into short bullets or move it behind a reference — it concentrates setup order, approval rules, pricing and internal-only notes into one hard-to-parse block.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense, imperative and command-first with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows ("Search and help are how you learn Deepline", "Do not process a batch by looping direct tool calls"). Minor trimming targets remain — the Section 6 monitors paragraph is a rambling wall of prose and the final-message rules occasionally restate details — so it fits anchor 4 rather than 5.

4 / 5

Actionability

Fully executable throughout: copy-paste CLI blocks (`deepline runs tail <run-id>`, `deepline billing usage --request-id <job_id>`), a complete runnable Play example, exact link formats, a fill-in approval template, and concrete thresholds ("more than 10 rows or an estimated 5 credits", "0.13 credits per call"). Matches the anchor 5 example of copy-paste ready commands covering common cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Explicit numbered phases (Choose → Run → Get results → Scope and spend → Deliver → Automate → Feedback) with validation checkpoints and feedback loops for paid/batch work: "Test first… run a small representative sample", "Stop for a decision on wrong matches, low coverage or a changed cost", "read the file back with a strict reader before delivery", "after a type error, look at the data", and "A setup timeout does not prove historical processing completed".

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

References are clearly signaled and one level deep, but the 10 files referenced from the body (`recipes/account-orgchart.md`, `recipes/developer-signals.md`, `recipes/deepline-monitors.md`, `writing-outreach.md`, etc.) do not exist in the bundle — there is no recipes/ directory — while the bundle files that are provided (references/monitor-operations.md, references/run-events.md, scripts/clay-to-deepline.mjs, etc.) are never linked from SKILL.md. Scored against the actual bundle structure, navigation is broken in both directions, matching anchor 2's reference/navigation failure rather than anchor 3's mere signaling weakness.

2 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description identifies a clear GTM niche with strong provider-name trigger coverage, but it reads as a keyword dump rather than a capability description. It lacks any explicit "when to use this" guidance, which caps completeness, and the truncated provider list ("….") adds bulk without adding capability information.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. "Use when the user needs GTM prospecting, lead enrichment, email finding/validation, outreach copy, or mentions any listed provider, Clay, or Reo.dev."

Trim or summarize the provider enumeration (e.g. "and 150+ providers — run deepline search to list them") and remove the dangling "…." truncation; describe 4-5 concrete actions instead (e.g. "Finds and validates contact emails, enriches companies and people from CSVs, runs batch Plays").

Add natural trigger synonyms users would say, such as "prospecting", "find emails", "build a lead list", and "lead list".

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain and several capability areas ("GTM leads, enrichment, outreach, Plays, developer signals/Reo.dev") but phrases them as noun categories rather than concrete actions, and the bulk is a truncated provider-name enumeration that describes no capabilities. It is above anchor 2 (more than minimal/generic coverage) but below anchor 4 (no verb-phrased specific actions).

3 / 5

Completeness

The "what" is present ("GTM leads, enrichment, outreach, Plays, developer signals/Reo.dev") but there is no "Use when…" clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, which caps this dimension at 3 per the judging guidelines. The provider list is not a substitute for when-to-use guidance.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural GTM vocabulary ("leads", "enrichment", "outreach", "developer signals") plus 100+ provider names users actually say (clay, crunchbase, hubspot, hunter, pitchbook) give good keyword coverage. It falls short of anchor 5 because the list is cut off with "…." and common phrases like "prospecting" or "email finding/validation" are absent.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The GTM framing and provider enumeration (deepline_native, Reo.dev) form a mostly distinct niche with minor conflict risk. Not anchor 5 because the list includes generic infrastructure providers (postgres, clickhouse, databricks, notion, cloudflare) that could pull it toward provider-specific tasks unrelated to GTM.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

relative_links

Relative link issues: 12 missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

getaero-io/gtm-eng-skills

Path

skills/deepline-gtm/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.