CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

deepline-gtm

GTM prospecting, enrichment, outreach, scoring, CSVs, and plays. Discovery: deepline-pre-research. Providers: adyntel,ai_ark,allegrow,apify,attention,attio,aviato,bettercontact,bloomberry,bluesky,bounceban,browserbase,builtwith,cloudflare,contactout,crustdata,crustdata-v2,crustdata-v3,customer_db,dataforseo,datagma,deepline_ip_to_company,deepline_native,deeplineagent,discolike,dropleads,emailbison,emailguard,enformion,exa,findymail,firecrawl,firmable,forager,fullenrich,generic_http,gong,google_ads_audiences,google_workspace,hackernews,heyreach,hubspot,hunter,icypeas,instantly,intercom,ipqs,kernel,leadmagic,lemlist,limadata,linkedin_ads_audiences,linkedin_scraper,lusha,meta_audiences,nooks,openmart,opensosdata,openwebninja,outreach,parallel,peopledatalabs,podscan,predictleads,prospeo,rocketreach,salesforce,salesforge,scrapecreators,sentrion,serper,slack,smartlead,snowflake,sumble,theirstack,trestle,twitterapi,upcell,wiza,wizleads,zerobounce.

63

Quality

75%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

High

Do not use without reviewing

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/deepline-gtm/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable with strong workflow checkpoints and an exemplary progressive-disclosure structure that points to real sub-docs. Its main weakness is motivational padding that competes with context without adding operational value.

Suggestions

Trim the hortatory read-the-docs prose (e.g. the 'STOP', 'This is not optional', and all-caps 'JUST READ MORE' passages) to imperative one-liners; the routing table already carries the instruction.

Consider moving the long provider-playbook link list (Section 'Provider Playbooks') into a references file and linking it once, since SKILL.md is meant to be the routing layer rather than a provider index.

Consolidate the repeated read-the-sub-doc reminders in Sections 2 and 5 into a single canonical routing note to reduce redundancy.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly dense and operational (exact CLI flags, routing tables, approval templates) but padded with hortatory prose motivating the agent to read docs — e.g. "reading a doc for 5 seconds saves you from 10 failed tool calls", "This has happened repeatedly", and "READING MULTIPLE DOCS IS A GREAT IDEA AND OFTEN SUPER ESSENTIAL. JUST READ MORE." — which Claude does not need.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready guidance: concrete commands (`deepline tools search`, `deepline enrich --rows 0:1`), exact flag syntax, a verbatim approval template, and billing commands with specific examples throughout.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Multi-step processes are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops for batch/paid operations — pilot → request approval → full run only after approval, "If pilot fails, fix and re-run until successful", and the over-provision-then-filter Do/Don't list.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Clear Level 1/2/2.5/3 documentation hierarchy with a task→doc routing table, a recipes table, and a provider-playbook link list; references are one level deep, clearly signaled, and the referenced bundle paths (recipes/*.md, enriching-and-researching.md, provider-playbooks/*.md, references/, scripts/) are real and well organized.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

65%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description names a clear domain and natural trigger terms but reads more as a capability manifest (provider list) than a trigger-guided description. Adding an explicit "Use when..." clause and more concrete actions would lift completeness and specificity.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause (e.g. 'Use when the user wants to build prospect lists, enrich contacts, verify emails, score leads, or run GTM outreach campaigns').

Replace or supplement the categorical action list with concrete actions (e.g. 'find companies and contacts, verify emails, waterfall enrichment, score and personalize outreach') to raise specificity from 2 to 3.

Move or summarize the long provider enumeration out of the description; it adds token weight without improving triggerability.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the GTM domain and several activity categories ("prospecting, enrichment, outreach, scoring, CSVs, and plays") but these are categorical labels rather than multiple concrete granular actions like "extract emails" or "build lead lists".

2 / 3

Completeness

It answers "what" (prospecting, enrichment, outreach, scoring, CSVs, plays) but provides no explicit "Use when..." trigger clause; the "Discovery: deepline-pre-research" line and provider list do not tell Claude when to invoke the skill, capping completeness at 2.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural GTM vocabulary a user would actually say — "prospecting", "enrichment", "outreach", "scoring", "CSVs" — giving good coverage of common variations rather than only technical jargon.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The "GTM" framing, named providers, and "plays" carve a recognizable niche and distinguish it from the sibling deepline-pre-research skill, but "prospecting, enrichment, outreach" is a broad envelope that could still overlap with generic sales/contact skills.

2 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

relative_links

Relative link issues: 96 missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
getaero-io/gtm-eng-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.