Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Excellent content: lean, fully executable, and well-organized, covering task discovery, single runs, batch runs, affected-project runs, and useful flags with concrete examples. The only meaningful gap is the absence of failure-handling guidance (what to do when tasks fail, how to interpret failed-task output) for its batch-style commands.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: it never explains what Nx is, and every line is a command, flag, or concrete example (e.g., "You can run tasks with Nx in the following way", "--nxBail — stop execution after the first failed task"). Matches anchor 5; there is no over-explanation that would justify anchor 4. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands throughout: "nx run <project>:<task>", "nx run-many -t build test lint typecheck", "nx affected -t test --base=main --head=HEAD", plus concrete flag examples and practical advice on npx/pnpx/yarn prefixes. Matches anchor 5 (executable commands covering the common cases). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sections are sequenced logically (understand which tasks exist → run single → run multiple → affected → flags) with unambiguous commands. However, there is no failure-handling or verification guidance (run → inspect failures → fix), and run-many/affected are batch-style invocations; this matches anchor 4 (clear sequence, minor validation gaps) rather than anchor 5's explicit feedback loops. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is ~50 lines, self-contained, needs no external references, and is organized into clear sections ("Understand which tasks can be run", "Run a single task", "Run tasks for affected projects", "Useful flags"). Per the under-50-lines guideline, well-organized sections alone warrant anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |