Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with copy-paste-ready commands, sensible schema pointers, and a well-signaled reference file for affected projects. Its weaknesses are redundancy — the same jq/target examples repeated across three sections — and inlining of the lengthy programmatic-examples block that would be better split into a reference, both of which cost tokens without adding guidance.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated jq target recipes (currently in Project Configuration, Target Information, and Programmatic Answers) into a single section and cross-reference it.
Move the Programmatic Answers example JSON outputs (project details, graph structure) into a references/ file like REFERENCES or EXAMPLES.md, keeping only one compact example per command inline.
Fix the near-duplicate schema-pointer sentence in Workspace Configuration (it says 'project-schema.json... nx project configuration options' but points at nx-schema.json), and tighten the workspace section by deferring key nx.json sections detail to the schema reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean, copy-paste commands, but the same jq recipes ("jq '.targets | keys'", "jq '.targets.build'") appear in three separate sections (Project Configuration, Target Information, and Programmatic Answers), and the Programmatic Answers section re-lists earlier commands wholesale. It is not 4 because the duplication is more than minor trimming, and not 2 because there is no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Every section provides fully executable bash commands with concrete flags, and the JSON recipes cover the common cases (list, filter, config, targets, graph, affected, troubleshooting). Commands are copy-paste ready with no pseudocode. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The read-only exploration task maps each question to unambiguous commands (Common Exploration Patterns, Troubleshooting), and error recovery is present ("nx reset if sync doesn't fix stale cache"). It is not 5 because the duplicated sections (e.g. Project Configuration vs Target Information vs Programmatic Answers) do not signal which to consult, creating mild ambiguity; not 3 because there are no validation gaps for a non-destructive, read-only skill. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The bundle structure is good: one clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference ("read the [affected projects reference](references/AFFECTED.md)", verified to exist) and well-organized section headers. It is not 5 because the ~100-line Programmatic Answers block with full example JSON outputs is inlined content that would fit better in a reference file, mirroring AFFECTED.md. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |