Tessl • The package manager for agent skills

SkillPublic

rendered-pack-5bf21e8c

Use when editing MoltNet docs, especially onboarding, docs IA, examples, tone, cross-links, and avoiding duplicated canonical guidance.

Quality

51%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.agents/skills/rendered-pack-5bf21e8c/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

36%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a rendered context pack whose operative guidance — one-canonical-flow, tone, and cross-linking rules — is genuine but scattered across a bulk of historical commit records and provenance metadata. There is no workflow or validation sequence for actually performing a docs edit, and the monolithic listing wastes tokens on scaffolding that doesn't instruct.

Suggestions

Open with a distilled 'Docs editing rules' section (one canonical flow, tone, cross-linking without duplication) so the operative guidance leads instead of being mined from entry history.

Trim or relocate provenance scaffolding — Entry IDs, CIDs, signers, branches, timestamps — to a reference file or compact appendix; it consumes most of the token budget without instructing.

Add a short editing workflow with explicit checkpoints, e.g. 'edit → run nx docs lint / pnpm --filter @moltnet/docs build → fix and re-validate', turning the validation commands already mentioned in history into a feedback loop.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The ~180-line body is dominated by provenance scaffolding (Entry IDs, CIDs, signers, branches, timestamps) and redundant restatements of the same tone rule across multiple entries — noticeably verbose with several padded sections rather than the mostly-efficient level 3.	2 / 5
Actionability	Real directives exist ('prefer one canonical flow over a parallel page', 'Extend the existing page at the relevant decision point', 'Avoid phrases like "this section should stay short"'), but they are buried among 7 of 9 entries that are purely historical commit records, so guidance is concrete yet incomplete and unconsolidated.	3 / 5
Workflow Clarity	No editing workflow or step sequence is presented anywhere; validation mentions ('pnpm --filter @moltnet/docs build', 'nx format:write') appear only incidentally inside commit narratives rather than as explicit checkpoints, matching the rough-sequence-with-many-gaps anchor at best.	2 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Per-entry '###' headers and consistent metadata blocks give recognizable structure, but the body is a monolithic inline dump with no prioritization of rules over history and no navigation to separate materials (no bundle files exist), fitting some-structure-but-could-be-better-organized.	3 / 5
	Total	10 / 20 Passed

Description

45%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is well-scoped to a specific project niche with an explicit 'Use when' trigger, but it never states what the skill actually does or contains, so it functions as a trigger clause alone. Keyword coverage is adequate but misses natural synonyms and leans on internal jargon like 'docs IA'.

Suggestions

State the what before the when, e.g. 'Provides docs-editing rules and past-commit context for MoltNet documentation. Use when editing MoltNet docs...'

Replace jargon like 'docs IA' with natural phrasing users would say, e.g. 'docs structure' or 'information architecture', and add synonyms such as 'documentation' and 'docs style'.

Name one or two concrete actions the skill performs (e.g. 'check tone, consolidate duplicated canonical pages, verify cross-links') so specificity rises above a bare domain enumeration.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain ('editing MoltNet docs') and enumerates focus areas (onboarding, docs IA, examples, tone, cross-links), but states no concrete capabilities beyond the generic action 'editing' — matching the anchor for domain plus 1-2 concrete actions rather than the several specific actions of level 4.	3 / 5
Completeness	The 'when' is explicit ('Use when editing MoltNet docs...') but the 'what' — what the skill actually provides or does — is never stated; scoring only what is explicit, this matches the 'only when is present without what' anchor rather than level 3, which requires a clear what.	2 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Relevant keywords like 'docs', 'onboarding', 'tone', and 'cross-links' are present, but common variations users would naturally say ('documentation', 'docs style', 'wording') are missing and 'docs IA' is internal jargon, placing it at the some-keywords-missing-synonyms anchor.	3 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Scoping to 'MoltNet docs' with named sub-areas creates a clear project-level niche with distinct triggers, leaving only minor overlap risk with other MoltNet or docs-adjacent skills — mostly distinct rather than fully minimal-conflict.	4 / 5
	Total	12 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
metadata_version	'metadata.version' is missing	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: getlarge/themoltnet
Path: .agents/skills/rendered-pack-5bf21e8c/SKILL.md
Revision: 098a447

Reviewed: 10 hours ago

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.

rendered-pack-5bf21e8c

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?