Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, well-structured, and gives concrete guidance for forming and running a two-agent committee. Its main weakness is workflow clarity: the parallel, potentially long-running operation lacks an explicit validation/convergence checkpoint, which caps it at 3. Progressive disclosure is strong for a short single-file skill.
Suggestions
Add an explicit convergence/validation checkpoint in the Workflow, e.g. a step that verifies both agents actually reached agreement and defines what to do if they do not converge within a reasonable turn count.
Tighten phrasing like 'Contrast is the point of a committee, so pick profiles from different provider families when possible' into a direct instruction to further improve conciseness.
Specify what a 'problem-level prompt' should contain (one or two concrete bullets) so the first workflow step is fully actionable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and well-organized with no padded concept explanations; a few short phrases (e.g. 'Contrast is the point of a committee') could be trimmed but earn their place. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable guidance (create agents in parallel via Paseo with '[Committee] <task>' titles, the exact no-edits suffix to append) with minor gaps around how to write the problem-level prompt. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A numbered five-step sequence is present, but this batch/parallel operation has no explicit validation or convergence checkpoint beyond 'Keep going until they converge', so it sits at the validation-gap anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections (Prerequisites, Composition, Hard rules, Workflow) for a short self-contained skill with no bundle files; minor gap is that the referenced 'paseo' skill is not a one-level-deep local reference. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |