Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A dense, highly executable reference that assumes Claude's competence and adds only Paseo-specific contracts, with strong validation loops and troubleshooting throughout. Its main weakness is structure: everything lives in one monolithic SKILL.md with no bundle files, relying on external web docs and inline examples rather than split local references.
Suggestions
Move the per-contribution code walkthroughs (composer pills, timeline transformers/renderers, themes, attachment sources) into files under references/ and keep one minimal example per pattern inline, trimming the duplicated theme/layout styling boilerplate from the remaining examples.
Extract the OVERVIEW.md authoring contract and registry-stopgap rules from 'Publishing a listing' into a references/publishing.md and summarize the four content rules in SKILL.md.
Consider moving the 'Common failures' symptom-to-cause list into a references/troubleshooting.md so the verify checklist stays the primary post-change workflow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Nearly every sentence carries Paseo-specific contract detail Claude cannot know (import boundaries, cleanup semantics, host trust model, reload behavior) with no padding about known concepts, and code blocks are complete rather than annotated tutorials. It falls short of anchor 5 because the theme/layout styling boilerplate (e.g. `padding: layout.compact ? 16 : 24`, `backgroundColor: theme.colors.surface0`) is repeated across the panel, screen, and pill examples, and the registry-stopgap rules in 'Publishing a listing' run long. These are still minor instances of over-length relative to the whole, fitting anchor 4 rather than dropping to anchor 3's 'some unnecessary explanation'. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every section provides copy-paste-ready material: `paseo plugin init`, `npm install`, the full install/update/ls/reload/logs command list, complete client/server/shared TypeScript for each contribution type, a concrete `rg` audit command for the mobile checklist, and per-symptom debugging steps. This matches anchor 5 ('fully executable; copy-paste ready code or commands; specific examples cover the common cases'); anchor 4's 'minor gaps' does not apply since even error states and the enable-permission workflow are fully specified. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequences are explicit with validation checkpoints and feedback loops: typecheck before install/reload, the global-switch procedure requiring `pluginsEnabled` in `appliedPaths` or a re-read confirmation, `paseo plugin ls` requiring `running`, and a failed-reload loop (inspect `plugin ls`/`plugin logs`, fix, typecheck, reload again). The 'Verify the outcome' checklist and 'Common failures' symptom-to-cause list match anchor 5's 'explicit validation steps; feedback loops for error recovery; checklists', and the destructive install/enable operations all carry validation, so no cap applies. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Navigation is genuinely good — the contributions table routes each request type to a specific external reference section and example repo, and every doc link (publishing, reference.md sections, migration guide) is one level deep and clearly signaled. It does not reach anchor 5 because nothing is split into bundle files: a 735-line body inlines full walkthroughs (pills, timeline, themes, the publishing contract) that belong in local reference files, and the skill doubles as the offline fallback for the entire public docs. It sits above anchor 3 since references are clearly signaled and organized, not buried or merely 'could be' separate. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |