Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary lean review checklist: zero padding, concrete file targets, unambiguous acceptance criteria, and executable validation commands. The only gap is workflow-level — it never sequences the steps or tells Claude how to handle a failed guardrail or report findings.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every line earns its place: the 41-line body has exact file globs, terse guardrail criteria ("`schema` uses `mobilebuildmcp.output.<name>` format", "`schemaVersion` uses integer strings only"), and four exact commands — no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable: the Validation section lists copy-paste-ready commands (`npm run test:schema-fixtures`, `npm test -- src/core/__tests__/structured-output-schema.test.ts`, `npm run typecheck`, `npx skill-check ...`), files are given as exact paths/globs, and each guardrail is a concrete, checkable acceptance criterion rather than vague direction. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The section order (Review scope → Files to inspect → Guardrails → Validation) implies a coherent review flow and the commands serve as checkpoints, but there is no explicit sequencing or failure handling (e.g. what to do when a guardrail fails or how to report findings). Not level 5's explicit validate-fix-retry loop; clearly above level 3's implicit-only checkpoints. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, has no bundle files to disclose, and its four well-labeled sections split scope, targets, criteria, and validation cleanly — per the rubric's simple-skill guidance, well-organized sections alone merit a 5 here. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |