Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-organized review checklist: lean bullets, concrete commands, explicit validation steps, and appropriately scoped sections with no unnecessary references. Its only soft spot is a slightly underspecified validation entry point ('Run targeted Vitest command for touched tests') and no guidance for handling validation failures.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is pure lean bullets — file globs, guardrail rules, and exact commands — with zero padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, matching the 'every token earns its place' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete commands ('npm test', 'npm run typecheck', 'npm run test:snapshots', 'npx skill-check ...') and specific rules ('do not call real xcodebuild, xcrun, AXe, devices, or simulators') make the guidance mostly executable; the minor gap is 'Run targeted Vitest command for touched tests', which leaves the exact invocation unspecified, placing it at anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The section structure implies a clear sequence (review scope -> files to inspect -> guardrails -> validation) with explicit validation commands and a conditional checkpoint ('If fixtures/schemas changed'), matching anchor 4; it is not 5 because there is no feedback loop describing what to do when a validation step fails, and not 3 because checkpoints are explicit rather than implicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, single-purpose, needs no external references (none exist in the bundle), and is cleanly organized into well-labeled sections, which the rubric's simple-skill guideline scores as anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |