Conciseness

Every section is instruction or non-obvious operational knowledge (e.g., the "Running eslint on all of static/app/ can take 2+ minutes" tip); there is no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Lean and efficient throughout.

Actionability

Fully executable: copy-paste-ready commands parameterized by $0/$1 ("pnpm exec eslint --fix --rule '@sentry/scraps/$0: error' \"$1\""), concrete per-scale strategies, a specific PR title convention, and the exact prek invocation. Not score 4, since no minor gaps in executable guidance exist.

Workflow Clarity

Clear sequence (understand rule → assess scale → choose strategy → fix loop → coordinate → verify) with explicit validation checkpoints: "Re-run after each batch to verify", "Always review the diff after --fix before committing", and a final verification command that "Should report 0 problems". Feedback loops are present for this batch operation, so the batch-cap of 3 does not apply.

Progressive Disclosure

Per-rule fix details are appropriately externalized to references/fix-patterns.md and references/token-taxonomy.md (both exist, one level deep, with the § sections the table cites), surfaced via a well-signaled rule-to-reference table and a MUST-load instruction for the taxonomy case.

Specificity

"Fix violations of an eslintPluginScraps rule across the codebase... Covers manual fixes, autofix, batching, and codemod strategies" enumerates multiple concrete actions that comprehensively cover the skill's domain. Anchor 4 would require minor coverage gaps, which are absent.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both: what ("Fix violations of an eslintPluginScraps rule across the codebase", with strategy coverage) and when ("Use when asked to 'fix lint violations'..." with six concrete trigger phrases). Matches the anchor-5 example structure.

Trigger Term Quality

"fix lint violations", "apply a lint rule", "roll out a lint rule", "enforce a rule codebase-wide", "fix design system lint" are natural user phrases, but common variations like "lint errors", "eslint errors", or "fix warnings" are missing. Fits anchor 4 (good coverage, a few natural terms missing) rather than 5's synonym/extension tier.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche (Sentry's scraps ESLint plugin rules) with distinct trigger phrases; minimal overlap risk with generic lint or formatting skills. Both what and when are domain-specific enough to avoid mis-triggering.