Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable overview that follows a search-first workflow and cleanly offloads detailed parameter reference to a separate file. Minor conciseness redundancy and the absence of full invocation examples keep two dimensions at 4 rather than 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, but the 'search before reading / map of the codebase in milliseconds' rationale is restated across the core principle and step 3, a minor instance of over-explanation that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete tool names with specific parameters (fileFilter, languageFilter, minScore default 0.10, mode "interactive", SOCRATICODE_WATCHER env vars) plus a Goal→Tool table give mostly executable guidance, but there are no full copy-paste invocation examples to reach a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered sequence (1–6) with status-checking and troubleshooting checkpoints in step 5; exploration is not a destructive/batch operation so the validation cap does not apply, but the checkpoints are implicit rather than explicit validate-then-proceed gates. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-organized overview that delegates full per-tool parameter detail to a single one-level-deep, clearly signaled reference file ('For full parameter details on every tool, see references/tool-reference.md'), which exists as a real bundle file. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |