Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and action-dense, giving executable CLI commands and concrete response shapes rather than abstract instruction, with clear sequencing and error-recovery guidance for a read-only explain skill. Organization is clean and self-contained with no reference sprawl.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean — a primitives table, fields of interest, a compact JSON snippet, error codes, and composition tips — with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place rather than the padded-but-accurate style of a 2. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable commands (e.g. `bestblogs explain profile --json`, `bestblogs explain sources --days 7 --json`, `bestblogs explain score RAW_xxx --json`), a real JSON response shape, and named fields, making the guidance copy-paste ready rather than the pseudocode of a 2. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 组合建议 section gives an explicit ordered procedure (依次调 profile → sources → 建议) and the 错误处理 section maps 401 and empty-list outcomes to concrete next actions, supplying the error-recovery feedback loop the 3 anchor expects; the operations are read-only explain calls so no destructive/batch validation checkpoint is required. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is self-contained in a single well-sectioned file with no nested references and no monolithic wall of text; with no bundle files needed, the clear 何时使用/原语/动作/错误处理/组合建议 organization satisfies the well-organized-sections expectation for a self-contained skill. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |