CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

cli-commands

Use when adding or modifying CLI command (`but` commands) under `crates/but/src`.

65

Quality

77%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.agents/skills/cli-commands/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Imagine we're implementing a new commit3 command. The high-level structure for that must be as follows.

Arguments

Arguments live in crates/but/src/args. For our commit command that would be crates/but/src/args/commit3.rs:

use crate::args::atoms::CliIdArg;

/// Create a commit.
///
/// More details about the command here...
#[derive(Debug, clap::Parser)]
#[cfg_attr(feature = "raw-clap-docs", clap(verbatim_doc_comment))]
#[deny(missing_docs)]
pub struct Platform {
    /// The message to use for the commit.
    #[clap(short, long, group = "commit_message")]
    pub message: Option<Vec<String>>,

    /// Place the commit on the branch `BRANCH`.
    #[clap(short, long, value_name = "BRANCH", group = "targeting")]
    pub branch: Option<Option<CliIdArg>>,

    /// One or more changes to commit.
    pub changes: Vec<CliIdArg>,
}

In crates/but/src/args/mod.rs:

#[cfg(feature = "legacy")]
#[cfg_attr(feature = "raw-clap-docs", clap(verbatim_doc_comment))]
#[clap(hide = true, name = "_commit3")]
Commit3(commit3::Platform),

Things to note:

Arguments that refer to Git objects (such as commits, branches, files, hunks, etc.) use some type from crates/but/src/args/atoms/ and not String or another loose type.

Use CliIdArg for arguments that reference existing Git objects such as branches, commits, files, etc. This allows the user to use short IDs or fully qualified names.

String should only be used for truly loose text input such as commit messages.

Platform and all of its fields must have documentation. The Subcommands variant intentionally has no doc comment because clap obtains the command documentation from Platform.

Use #[clap(group = "...")] to create mutually exclusive groups of arguments.

Commands with tricky grammar can define a pub(crate) const ERROR_EXAMPLES next to Platform and register it in args::error_examples; the block is appended after clap parse errors. At most 4 lines, each a but <cmd> ... # what it does invocation that works as written (e.g. include -m where omitting it would open an editor).

Handling the command

Add a match arm to crates/but/src/lib.rs to handle the command:

match cmd {
    Subcommands::Commit3(commit_args) => {
        use crate::utils::IntermediateChannel;

        let status_after = args.status_after;
        let mut ctx = setup::init_ctx(
            &args,
            InitCtxOptions {
                background_sync: BackgroundSync::Enabled { silent: false },
                ..Default::default()
            },
            out,
        )?;
        out.begin_status_after(status_after);

        let outcome = command::legacy::commit3::commit(
            &mut ctx,
            IntermediateChannel::new(out),
            commit_args,
        )
        .emit_metrics(metrics_ctx)?;
        out.print_cli_output(outcome)?;

        run_status_after_if_requested(status_after, &mut ctx, out);

        Ok(())
    }

    // all the other commands...
}

Things to note:

Use IntermediateChannel. Do not pass OutputChannel to commands.

Use OutputChannel::print_cli_output to print the final output from the command. This ensures we handle all supported formats. If only human format is supported, use OutputChannel::print_cli_output_human.

Implementing the command

In crates/but/src/command/legacy/commit3.rs

pub fn commit(
    ctx: &mut Context,
    out: IntermediateChannel<'_>,
    args: Platform,
) -> CliResult<CommitOutcome> {
    // get whatever dependencies we need from `Context` such as
    // `RepoExclusiveGuard`, `IdMap`, `RefInfo`, etc.

    // resolve the arguments into a `CommitOperation`
    let commit_operation = resolve(ctx, args)?;

    // Run the operation
    let outcome = run(ctx, commit_operation)?;

    // Return the outcome which will be printed by the caller
    Ok(outcome)
}

fn resolve(ctx: &mut Context, args: Platform) -> CliResult<CommitOperation> {
    let Platform { message, branch, changes } = args;
    // ...
}

fn run(ctx: &mut Context, commit_op: CommitOperation) -> anyhow::Result<CommitOutcome> {
    match commit_op {
        // ...
    }
}

#[must_use]
struct CommitOutcome {
    new_commit: ObjectId,
}

impl CliOutputHuman for CommitOutcome {
    fn on_human(self, out: &mut dyn WriteWithUtils, _theme: &Theme) -> anyhow::Result<()> {
        let Self { new_commit } = self;

        writeln!(
            out,
            "Created commit {}",
            theme::Commit(new_commit, None),
        )?;

        Ok(())
    }
}

impl CliOutput for CommitOutcome {
    fn on_shell(self, out: &mut dyn WriteWithUtils) -> anyhow::Result<()> {
        let Self { new_commit } = self;

        writeln!(out, "{}", new_commit.to_hex_with_len(7))?;

        Ok(())
    }

    fn on_json(self) -> impl serde::Serialize {
        #[derive(Serialize)]
        struct Output {
            commit: HexHash,
        }

        let Self { new_commit } = self;

        Output { commit: new_commit.into() }
    }
}

Things to note:

Commands follow a resolve then run structure.

run doesn't print its final output. It returns something that implements CliOutput / CliOutputHuman which the caller can then print.

resolve returns CliResult because it needs to reject bad user input.

run returns anyhow::Result because it can only hit internal errors. Bad user input is handled by resolve.

resolve translates CLI arguments into domain targets and validates user input. It may query repository state to disambiguate or reject input, but should not retain derived data in the operation.

run() loads current repository state and computes results. Commit counts, diffs, statistics, branch details, current tips, and workspace projections generally belong in run(). State derivable from those identifiers and the context belongs in run().

The operation should not contain types from crate::args::atoms.

A non-CLI caller such as the TUI should be able to construct an operation from domain identifiers without reproducing repository queries from resolve(). If it must compute counts, diffs, or branch metadata to build the operation, those fields probably belong in run().

The operation does not contain diff specs (usually in the form Vec<DiffSpec>). It should instead contain CliIds which run turns into Vec<DiffSpec> using DiffSpecBuilder. This makes it easier for the status TUI to call run directly.

User-input pickers and prompts are created via InputOutputChannel accessed through IntermediateChannel::prepare_for_terminal_input.

The JSON output includes both commit IDs and change IDs.

Use AllowMergedArg and MergedUpstream to verify we don't mutate merged commits and branches.

Printing of commits, branches, change IDs, etc. uses newtypes from theme such as theme::Branch and theme::Commit. This ensures consistent coloring.

Bad user input errors use bad_input(...), optionally with .arg_name(), .arg_value(), and .hint().

Avoid making the operation or outcome types implement serde::Serialize. Define the specific types needed inside fn on_json. This makes it harder to break compatibility by accident. Reusing Serialize from existing domain types is fine.

More examples

For examples of this structure in practice see

  • crates/but/src/command/legacy/commit.rs
  • crates/but/src/command/legacy/move.rs
  • crates/but/src/command/legacy/squash.rs
  • crates/but/src/command/legacy/diff.rs
Repository
gitbutlerapp/gitbutler
Last updated
First committed

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.