Conciseness

Mostly lean and assumes Claude's competence, but a few introductory sentences like 'The format is shared across hosts (Claude Code, Cursor, and others); only the install location differs' could be trimmed.

Actionability

Concrete guidance throughout — specific Glean tool params ('runbook OR checklist OR process owner:me'), named agents to spawn, and yaml/markdown templates — with only minor gaps in executable detail for the generator output.

Workflow Clarity

Two clearly numbered workflows (A and B) with a vetting/decline feedback loop ('declines, with reasons, if the idea fails the skepticism tests'); not destructive or batch, so no cap applies, but error-recovery checkpoints are light.

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized sections with a clearly signaled one-level-deep pointer ('See using-glean/reference/ for the param shape'); no bundle files are present here, so structure rather than reference depth drives the score.

Specificity

Names several concrete actions ('authoring a new agent skill', 'deciding when a skill is worth creating', 'generating a SKILL.md', 'discovering skill opportunities') with only minor abstraction in framing like 'progressive disclosure' and 'common pitfalls'.

Completeness

Explicitly answers what (guide through authoring, deciding worth, format, pitfalls, discovering, generating) and when (concrete trigger phrases plus an explicit boundary: 'Don't use it for invoking existing skills — only when authoring a new one').

Trigger Term Quality

Comprehensive natural-phrase coverage with synonyms ('create a skill', 'write a skill', 'make a skill') plus varied intents ('SKILL.md format', 'what should I automate', 'find skill opportunities') that users would actually say.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche of authoring/understanding new skills with an explicit exclusion of invoking existing skills, minimizing conflict with skill-invocation skills.