CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

create-agent

Create a new custom agent from scratch. Runs a 6-phase interview to understand purpose, capabilities, triggers, output format, and coordination rules, then generates the agent file. Triggers: EN: "create a new agent", "custom agent", "I need a new agent", "build an agent", "new crew member". IT: "crea un nuovo agente", "agente personalizzato", "nuovo membro del crew". FR: "créer un nouvel agent", "agent personnalisé". ES: "crear un nuevo agente", "agente personalizado". DE: "neuen Agenten erstellen". PT: "criar um novo agente".

72

Quality

88%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

77%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body delivers highly actionable, well-sequenced workflow guidance with explicit checkpoints, but it is monolithic and carries notable redundancy across its mandatory-protocol rules. Splitting the post-it template and update steps into references and deduplicating the repeated 'never skip phases' rules would lift conciseness and progressive disclosure.

Suggestions

Deduplicate the repeated 'never generate the file before Phase 6' rules — consolidate the HARD CONSTRAINT, RULES, and 'ZERO exceptions' statements into a single authoritative block.

Move the verbatim Post-it Protocol template (and the registry/directory update steps) into a reference file under references/ and link to it one level deep, reducing the monolithic body.

Collapse the redundant two descriptions of the post-it resume behavior (step 0 and the dedicated Post-it Protocol section) into one.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is actionable and free of concept re-explanation, but it is padded with redundancy — 'NEVER generate the agent file before Phase 6 confirmation', 'NEVER jump to file generation before Phase 6…ZERO exceptions', and 'NEVER create an agent in one shot' restate the same constraint, and the Post-it Protocol is described twice (HARD CONSTRAINT step 0 and a dedicated section). It is not a 3 because tightening these repeats would lose nothing, and not a 1 because most content is operational rather than filler.

2 / 3

Actionability

As an instruction-only skill it gives concrete, executable guidance — the exact 'AskUserQuestion' tool, exact paths like '{{meta}}/states/architect.md' and '.platform/agents/{name}.md', a verbatim post-it template, and a full phase checklist. It is not a 2 because the guidance is specific and copy-ready rather than abstract; absence of code is not penalized for an instruction skill.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The 6-phase process is clearly sequenced with a checkbox PHASE CHECKLIST, a Phase 6 user-confirmation checkpoint before file generation, and a post-it resume mechanism for error recovery. It is not a 2 because validation checkpoints and feedback are explicit, not implicit.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist (references/, scripts/, assets/ are empty) and the skill is a single ~200-line monolithic file; sections are well organized, but sizable blocks like the post-it template and the registry/directory update steps are inline rather than split into one-level-deep references. It is not a 3 because content that could be separate is not split or signaled, and not a 1 because the in-file structure is clear and navigable.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: it states concrete capabilities in third person, provides explicit trigger phrases across six languages, and clearly answers both 'what' and 'when'. It occupies a distinct niche with low conflict risk.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — 'Create a new custom agent from scratch', 'Runs a 6-phase interview to understand purpose, capabilities, triggers, output format, and coordination rules', 'generates the agent file' — matching the score-3 anchor of multiple specific concrete actions. It is not a 2 because it goes beyond naming a domain to enumerate several distinct operations, and voice is third person so no penalty applies.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers 'what' ('Runs a 6-phase interview…then generates the agent file') and 'when' via an explicit 'Triggers:' clause with concrete phrases, matching the score-3 anchor. It is not a 2 because the 'when' is explicitly stated rather than merely implied.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Provides natural trigger phrases users would say — 'create a new agent', 'custom agent', 'I need a new agent', 'build an agent', 'new crew member' — with good multilingual coverage, matching the score-3 anchor. It is not a 2 because common variations are well covered rather than only partially present.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Targets a clear niche — custom agent creation — with dedicated triggers like 'create a new agent' and 'custom agent' that are unlikely to fire for unrelated skills. It is not a 2 because the triggers are specific to this single purpose rather than overlapping with similar skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
gnekt/My-Brain-Is-Full-Crew
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.