Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with concrete CLI commands and templates and a clear procedure, but it is somewhat verbose and monolithic. Adding explicit validation checkpoints in the scan workflow and splitting the large template/orchestration detail into reference files would raise the workflow-clarity and progressive-disclosure scores.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation/verification checkpoint in the Procedure — e.g., a step that confirms scanned deadlines were deduplicated across sources and date-parsed correctly before reporting — to create a feedback loop and lift workflow_clarity.
De-duplicate the Hey CLI scanning instructions that appear in both the 'Security: External Content' and 'Procedure' sections into a single source to improve conciseness.
Move the full output template and/or the inter-agent coordination protocol into clearly-signaled reference files (e.g., references/template.md, references/orchestration.md) referenced one level deep from the body to improve progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~217-line body is mostly efficient and directive, but repeats the Hey CLI scanning instructions in both the Security section and the Procedure, and the Post-it/agent-state material is verbose for a deadline-scan skill. Tightening these duplications would move it to the lean anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable commands — 'gws gmail users messages list' with sample query terms, 'hey box imbox --json', specific MCP tools (gmail_search_messages, gcal_list_events) — plus a copy-paste-ready output template and naming convention. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The numbered Procedure (scan emails, calendar, vault, build timeline, assign alert levels) gives a clear sequence with a dedicated Error Handling section, but batch/destructive scanning lacks explicit validation checkpoints or a verify-before-report feedback loop, which caps the score per the rubric guidance. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized, but the skill is a single monolithic SKILL.md with templates and inter-agent protocol inline; it also points to external non-bundle paths (.platform/references/..., My-Brain-Is-Full-Crew/docs/...) rather than splitting detail into clearly-signaled one-level reference files. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |