CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

email-triage

Scan and process unread emails. Scores by priority (VIP, urgency, deadlines), classifies, saves relevant emails as vault notes, and generates a triage report. Triggers: EN: "check my email", "what's in my inbox", "process emails", "email triage", "anything urgent in email?", "save important emails". IT: "controlla le email", "cosa c'è nella mia inbox", "triage email", "processa le email", "email urgenti". FR: "vérifier mes emails", "trier mes emails". ES: "revisar mi correo", "triaje de emails". DE: "E-Mails prüfen", "Posteingang sichten". PT: "verificar meus emails", "triagem de emails".

66

Quality

78%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./tests/regression/snapshot/.claude/skills/email-triage/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable with concrete commands and templates, and the procedure is well sequenced, but it is long and monolithic: batch-operation validation checkpoints are implicit and the bulk of the templates/report material would benefit from being split into reference files.

Suggestions

Add an explicit validation/verification checkpoint in the Procedure (e.g. after note creation, confirm the file exists with expected frontmatter before moving on) to raise workflow clarity above the batch-operation cap.

Move the five note templates and the final-report example into a `references/templates.md` file and link to it from SKILL.md, keeping only the priority-scoring rules and procedure inline.

Tighten the Inter-Agent Coordination and Email Analytics sections to essentials, or relocate the full orchestration protocol detail to the already-referenced `.claude/references/agent-orchestration.md`.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

It avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but ~440 lines inlines five full note templates, a complete final-report example, and detailed inter-agent coordination that could be tightened or externalized. Mostly efficient, but could be trimmed.

3 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, executable commands per backend (e.g. `gws gmail users messages list` with `is:inbox is:unread`, `Meta/scripts/tracker-today`, `hey threads <id> --json`), numeric priority-scoring rules, and exact template frontmatter; minor gaps where the full Hey CLI reference is deferred to the Postman agent file.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

An 8-step Procedure gives a clear sequence with error-handling and ambiguous-email flagging, but this is a batch operation over many emails with no explicit validate→fix→retry checkpoint, so the batch-operation cap applies.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Section headers give reasonable structure, but heavy content that belongs in separate files (five full templates, the report example) is inlined, and the only references point to runtime vault paths rather than clearly signaled skill-bundle files.

3 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description: third-person voice, concrete capability list, explicit trigger guidance in multiple languages, and a distinct niche. No vague fluff or over-claims.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — 'Scan and process unread emails', 'Scores by priority (VIP, urgency, deadlines)', 'classifies', 'saves relevant emails as vault notes', and 'generates a triage report' — giving comprehensive coverage of what the skill does.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' (scan/score/classify/save/report) and 'when' ('Triggers:' followed by concrete phrases), satisfying the top anchor for both dimensions.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Comprehensive natural-language triggers across six languages (e.g. 'check my email', 'what's in my inbox', 'email triage', 'anything urgent in email?', 'save important emails') including synonyms and phrasings users would actually say.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Email triage is a clear niche with distinct, email-specific triggers (inbox, email triage, urgent in email) carrying minimal conflict risk with unrelated skills.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
gnekt/My-Brain-Is-Full-Crew
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.