Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable skill body with executable commands, clear sequencing, and sensible file splitting. Slight verbosity in prerequisites and a vague PDF-verification step plus an unreferenced bundle file keep it just off the top anchors.
Suggestions
Replace the vague 'verify the PDF is not empty or corrupted' workflow step with a concrete check (e.g. test file size > 0 or run a PDF validity command).
Trim the license-notification prerequisite wording and fix the garbled DOI note ('this is DOI is not returned') for conciseness.
Either reference references/citation.bib from the body or remove it so no bundle file is orphaned.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Largely lean with actionable commands, but the license-notification prerequisite and the awkward DOI note ('this is DOI is not returned') are minor padding/over-explanation that could be trimmed, sitting just below the lean anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands (e.g. 'uv run scripts/search_arxiv.py --query ... --max_results 5 2>/dev/null > /tmp/...') with all options documented, covering the common search/download cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Workflow lists a clear 4-step sequence with a verification checkpoint (step 3: verify PDF not empty/corrupted) and concrete safe-extraction guidance for tar.gz, but the PDF verification method is vague rather than a concrete command. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with a one-level-deep, clearly signaled reference (references/query_syntax.md) and bundled scripts; minor gap is the orphaned references/citation.bib never referenced from the body. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |