Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a minimal, fully-actionable instruction for a trivial skill: a clear trigger and an exact reply, with no padding and no unnecessary references. It appropriately matches the simple-skill exceptions in the rubric.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Two lean lines assume Claude's competence and contain only the trigger condition and exact reply, matching 'Lean and efficient; assumes Claude's competence; every token earns its place'. It is not a 4 because there is no over-explanation to trim. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives an exact copy-paste reply ("Greetings from the skills-example extension! 👋") with a concrete trigger, matching 'Fully executable; copy-paste ready'. It is not a 4 because there are no gaps in the instruction. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple single-purpose skill whose single action is unambiguous (trigger -> fixed reply), so the simple-skill exception applies and it scores 5; no destructive or batch operation is present. It is not a 4 because the action is fully unambiguous. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, single-task, with no need for external references, so well-organized inline content suffices for a 5 per the rubric's simple-skill guidance; no nested references exist. It is not a 4 because nothing is misplaced or buried. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 20 / 20 Passed |