CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

string-reviewer

Use this skill when asked to review text and user-facing strings within the codebase. It ensures that these strings follow rules on clarity, usefulness, brevity and style.

60

Quality

70%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.gemini/skills/string-reviewer/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured, actionable checklist skill with efficient token use and excellent progressive disclosure via two clearly linked reference files. Its main limitation is the absence of an explicit sequenced workflow with validation checkpoints.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly lean, checklist-driven content that adds genuine guidance; minor redundancy (e.g., voice principles restate checklist rules) and a stray double period keep it just short of fully lean.

4 / 5

Actionability

Concrete rules with worked examples ('[Goal] + [Action]', 'Parsing logs...', the ❌/✅ output template) give executable guidance; a few directives remain abstract without full worked examples.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear, non-destructive single-purpose flow (audit against checklist, consult word list, emit the specified list format) with an explicit approval gate; lacks an explicit numbered sequence or checkpoints, capping it at 4.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized sections with two real, clearly signaled one-level-deep references (./references/word-list.md and ./references/settings.md) that appropriately offload bulk detail.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

62%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly states both what the skill does and when to use it, with a reasonably distinct niche. It is held back by a single primary action and somewhat limited keyword/synonym coverage.

Suggestions

Add concrete review actions (e.g., 'audit, flag, and suggest rewrites for user-facing strings') to lift specificity.

Expand trigger terms with natural synonyms like 'copy', 'UI text', 'labels', 'error messages', and 'toasts'.

Tighten the 'what' clause to name the concrete deliverable (a structured list of suggested string changes) rather than 'ensures strings follow rules'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain ('review text and user-facing strings') and the rule dimensions ('clarity, usefulness, brevity and style') but offers only one primary action rather than several distinct concrete actions.

3 / 5

Completeness

Provides an explicit 'Use this skill when...' trigger and a clear 'what' (ensures strings follow clarity/usefulness/brevity/style rules), though the 'what' is moderately abstract.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural phrases like 'review text' and 'user-facing strings' but omits common synonyms such as 'copy', 'UI text', 'labels', or 'messages'.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche of reviewing user-facing strings within a codebase is fairly distinct, with only minor overlap risk against general code-review skills.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
google-gemini/gemini-cli
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.