Content
57%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-organized and gives concrete guidance for a short, single-purpose skill, but it is padded with marketing filler, has a step-numbering error, and lacks validation checkpoints. Actionability is good but weakened by unverified tool references.
Suggestions
Remove the marketing filler ("highly valuable for B2B marketers, advertisers, and gaming publishers...") and tighten the disclaimer to respect the token budget.
Fix the duplicate "3." step numbering so the sequence reads cleanly 1–5, and add a checkpoint for when the transcript fetch fails or returns nothing.
Clarify how get_video_transcript / get_video_details are invoked (confirm they are available tools) or specify fallback behavior, so the guidance is fully actionable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is structured and actionable, but includes unnecessary filler ("This is highly valuable for B2B marketers, advertisers, and gaming publishers...") and a verbose disclaimer block that could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides concrete tool calls, a verbatim analysis prompt, and a precise output schema, but the referenced tools (get_video_transcript, get_video_details) are unverified and invoked with a placeholder, with no handling of missing/failing tools. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are listed and sequenced, but two steps share the same "3." label (duplicate numbering) and there are no validation checkpoints for edge cases such as a failed or empty transcript fetch. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, needs no external references, and is organized into clear sections (Objective, Execution Steps, Next Actions), meeting the simple-skill bar for progressive disclosure. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |