Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a lean, well-organized instruction skill with a clear multi-step workflow and an appropriately offloaded one-level-deep reference. The only gaps are the absence of a worked example and an explicit verify-fix-retry loop, which are minor for a non-destructive writing task.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and efficient with no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line is direct, actionable instruction and each token earns its place, matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance (load_skill_resource to read references/style-guide.md, a 4-part outline template, 5 numbered writing rules, a polish checklist) with only a minor gap: no worked example outline or sample section, matching anchor 4 rather than the fully-exampled anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 4-step sequence (Structure, Outline, Write, Polish) with a verify checkpoint ('Verify all code examples are complete and runnable'), but it lacks an explicit fix-and-retry feedback loop on that verification, matching anchor 4 rather than anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A concise overview with a well-signaled, verified one-level-deep reference (references/style-guide.md, which exists and is self-contained), with content appropriately split between inline workflow and the separate style guide; the under-50-line simple-skill exception applies, matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |