Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, actionable five-step workflow with named tools, parameters, and a well-specified deliverable. Its only real weakness is the absence of validation/feedback checkpoints, which is mitigated by the read-only nature of the operations.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~15-line body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, explaining nothing it already knows. Minor trimmable padding remains ("Go beyond keyword spam and find actual industry movements", "Do not just read titles"), so it sits at anchor 4 rather than the fully lean anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete tool calls with parameters are named throughout (get_trending_videos with video_category_id "20"/"28" and region_code, search_channel_videos, get_video_transcript on the top 2-3 videos, generate_timestamp_url, publish_file) plus a defined deliverable structure. It falls short of anchor 5 because no exact call syntax or video-selection criteria are given, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered 5-step sequence with the optional step flagged and a structured output spec (Macro Trend / Competitor Actions / Direct Proof). It lacks the validation checkpoint and feedback loop of anchor 5, but the operations are read-only so the destructive/batch cap does not apply; anchor 4 fits. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is self-contained at under 50 lines with no bundle files present and none needed; content is organized into labeled objective, numbered steps, deliverable spec, and next actions. Per the rubric's simple-skill guideline this qualifies for anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |