Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, well-structured, and actionable, naming the specific tools and metrics to use across a clear four-step workflow. Its main gap is the absence of explicit validation checkpoints and an undefined match_score formula, which keep actionability and workflow clarity just below the top anchor.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: it states the objective, four numbered execution steps, and next actions with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows, matching the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It names concrete tools to call (search_youtube, get_video_details, calculate_engagement_metrics, analyze_sentiment_heuristic) and specific outputs (engagement_rate, active_rate, match_score, a table), which is mostly executable guidance; it falls short of 5 because formula details and exact match_score computation are not specified. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four-step Search → Data Gathering → Evaluation → Reporting sequence is clear with a conditional branching hint (use get_date_range first for a time frame), but it lacks explicit validation/checkpoint feedback loops, so it sits just below the 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | For a sub-50-line skill with no bundle files and no need for external references, the body is well organized into Objective, Execution Steps, and Next Actions sections, qualifying for the simple-skill exception that lets progressive disclosure score 5 with just well-organized sections. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |