Google Docs: Append text to a document.
72
66%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/gws-docs-write/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
32%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
The description is very terse—it identifies the platform and a single action but lacks a 'Use when...' clause, natural trigger term variations, and multiple capability details. It would be difficult for Claude to confidently select this skill over other document-related skills in a large skill library.
Suggestions
Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause with trigger scenarios, e.g., 'Use when the user wants to add, append, or insert text into an existing Google Doc.'
Include natural keyword variations users might say, such as 'add text', 'write to Google Doc', 'update document content', or 'Google document'.
Expand the capability list if applicable—e.g., mention whether it supports appending formatted text, paragraphs, or content at specific locations.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (Google Docs) and one specific action (append text to a document), but only describes a single capability rather than listing multiple concrete actions. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Describes what it does (append text to a Google Doc) but has no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, which per the rubric caps completeness at 2, and the 'what' is also minimal—so this scores a 1. | 1 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes 'Google Docs' and 'append text' which are relevant keywords, but misses common variations users might say like 'add text', 'write to doc', 'insert content', or 'Google document'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Specifying 'Google Docs' and 'append text' provides some distinctiveness, but it could overlap with broader Google Docs editing skills or document writing skills without clearer scoping. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 7 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is an excellent, concise skill that does exactly what it needs to. It provides clear, actionable CLI usage with proper flags documentation, includes a safety caution for the write operation, and appropriately references shared configuration and related skills. No improvements needed.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every token earns its place. No unnecessary explanations of what Google Docs is or how APIs work. The content is lean, assumes Claude's competence, and focuses only on what's needed to use the command. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides exact CLI syntax, a complete flag table with required/default info, and a concrete copy-paste-ready example. The tip about rich formatting points to the alternative approach without belaboring it. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple single-purpose skill (append text to a doc). The single action is unambiguous, and it includes a clear caution about confirming with the user before executing a write operation, which serves as a validation checkpoint for this destructive action. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear prerequisite reference to shared auth/config skill, well-signaled 'See Also' links to related skills one level deep, and the content is appropriately scoped without inlining material that belongs elsewhere. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
metadata_field | 'metadata' should map string keys to string values | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
a3768d0
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.